Hi folks, I haven't noticed the differences that users are mentioning hear, but like Sandy I use precise peet entirely. His inflection and diction are fine for my needs. Best -James- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lou Kolb" <loukolb@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 12:17 AM Subject: [bookport] Re: New Beta Available >I agree, Sandy. I've always used Precise Pete because it's the brightest > sounding of the voices. By brightest, I mean the one with the most > treble. > Generally speaking, I find the brighter the tone or frequency response is, > the more intelligible the speech is. Or maybe it's just that I'm in my > fifties and my ears are going. <grin> Lou > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sandy Licht" <slicht@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 6:17 PM > Subject: [bookport] Re: New Beta Available > > >> I haven't noticed any change with Precise Pete or Perfect Paul.At 03:33 >> PM >> 3/15/2005, you wrote: >> >Apparently, not in some circles, Dave. The Good old BNS had adjustments > for >> >both pitch and frequency. They both made a difference although I'd be > hard >> >pressed to define it. I must also say that I never spent much time >> >exploring it once I found satisfactory settings for both. Lou >> >----- Original Message ----- >> >From: "David Allen" <wd8ldy@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 4:04 PM >> >Subject: [bookport] Re: New Beta Available >> > >> > >> > > Hi Clarence and list: >> > > >> > > Pitch is frequency, is it not? >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Dave >> > > >> >> Sandy Licht >> Phone: 409-898-8218 >> Jeremiah 29:11 - 14A >> 11For I know the plans I have for you," says the LORD. "They >> are plans for good and not for disaster, to give you a future and a hope. >> 12In those days when you pray, I will listen. 13If you look for me in > earnest, >> you will find me when you seek me. 14I will be found by you," says the >> LORD... >> >> > > >