[bookport] Re: Interesting observation
- From: "Walt Smith" <walt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:34:19 -0400
As I mentioned, both units are running precisely the same firmware. Besides,
my own unit never sounded like the loaner I'm using at the moment.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sarah Cranston" <cranston.sarah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:28 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Interesting observation
Hi Walt,
My guess is that the BP you're using now hasn't been updated to firmware
v2.0. When that firmware came out, there was a substantial difference in
the voice, mainly concerning frequency. Does this BP have a frequency
option in the settings, and if so, have you played around with it? This
might help, at least somewhat. I had the opposite reaction, I liked the
original speech a lot, and wish it hadn't changed, but I've gotten used to
it as long as I remember to crank up the frequency a point or three.
Sarah
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Walt Smith
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:07 PM
To: Book Port User List
Subject: [bookport] Interesting observation
Maybe one of the APH technical folks can comment on this one. I'm
temporarily using another BP unit that seems to be considerably older than
mine and I swear that there's a significant difference in the speech,
despite its having the same firmware on it. Over the life of the BP, have
there been changes in the Doubletalk voice synthesis? I'm finding the
temporary unit much harder to understand--especially on glottal sounds--than
the one I'm used to.
--
Walt Smith - Clearwater, FL
walt@xxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts: