[blindreplay] Re: Rm vs MP3 compression
- From: ovular23403@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: blindreplay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 09:39:44 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Hi
The big advantage with MP3 is it can be played back on a portable MP3 player
device as it is a widely accepted standard. I know the MP3 format is compressed
while the REAL format should be the same too - compressed. When you record Real
type streams there Replay AV 8 is recording the REAL stream, usually .ram most
of the time. If you find the file size is smaller and listen to the recordings
on your computer then continue to record them this way.
-----Original Message-----
>From: rs_denis <rs_denis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: May 10, 2009 6:38 PM
>To: blindreplay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [blindreplay] Rm vs MP3 compression
>
>I've noticed that when converting the dot rm or RA file is much smaller than
>the converted MP3 Does this mean that the bandwidth of the recording is
>significantly lower than the sampling rate of the MP3 setting, or are RM
>files significantly smaller than the MP3 files which emerge after
>conversion.
>RD
>
>--
>To unsubscribe: e-mail blindreplay-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe in
>subject
>To contact list owner: e-mail blindreplay-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe: e-mail blindreplay-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe in
subject
To contact list owner: e-mail blindreplay-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
