http://www.workers.org/articles/2015/11/09/why-bernie-sanders-isnt-socialist-in-defense-of-revolutionary-socialism/
Why Bernie Sanders isn’t socialist: In defense of revolutionary socialism
By Danny Haiphong posted on November 9, 2015
Share
If Bernie Sanders loses the Democratic Party nomination, does socialism
also lose? A recent reading of Fidel Castro’s speeches from the late
1980s defending socialism cast a spotlight on the differences between
building a real socialist society, in Cuba, and “socialism” as it is
discussed in the context of Sanders’ election campaign.
Cuba’s revolutionary leader, in a 1988 book entitled “In Defense of
Socialism,” provides key insights into what the defense of socialism
looked like for Cuba in the last years of the Soviet period. Fidel
explained to the Cuban people that “imperialism is trying to present
socialism as failure in practice … and it is extolling to the utmost the
alleged advantages of its selfish and repugnant capitalist system.”
This only intensified after the Soviet Union fell in 1991. The world
capitalist crisis of the 1970s produced a general slowdown in production
and prompted U.S. imperialism to escalate its war on socialism around
the world. Many young people born after the Soviet period were left with
little opportunity to examine the prospects of revolutionary socialism.
These conditions supported Sanders’ rise in this year’s presidential
elections.
A Nov. 5 CNN article suggests that the Sanders campaign is losing ground
to Hillary Clinton. Clinton’s deep corporate support and long record of
performance in service of the military industrial complex has ultimately
made her the favorite for the Democratic Party nomination.
However, the number of months Sanders stayed competitive with Clinton
had much to do with his self-proclaimed title as a “socialist.” He
promoted policies such as student debt relief and universal health care
to back up his title. But Sanders isn’t a socialist. Socialism must be
defended from the misleading confines of the capitalist elections.
The appeal of Sanders-style socialism rests on the reality that workers
and oppressed people are being drained by the crisis of U.S. capitalism.
Savage austerity, ruthless privatization and heightened exploitation
have degraded the social condition of all workers, especially Black
workers. Simultaneously, U.S. capitalist society has continued to teach
the masses that socialist countries such as Cuba are corrupt
dictatorships at worst and unrealistic at best.
Sanders has been useful to the ruling capitalist class, even though they
don’t reward him for this. His campaign hooked the growing number of
disaffected workers back into the Democratic Party with his commentary
on issues such as the lack of affordable health care and the
predominance of low-wage work. He has done so under the assumption that
such issues can be resolved under the dictates of U.S. capital.
The task at hand is to distinguish revolutionary socialism from Sanders’
politics so the two are never confused. The fundamental contradiction
under capitalism is that between the tiny clique of capitalists that
privately own the means of production and the billions of workers they
exploit. The capitalists keep power through the army, police, courts and
media that serve them. It is this social relationship that allows the
bosses to exploit workers and oppressed peoples for immense profits here
and around the globe.
Revolutionary socialism is socialized production administered by the
government, popular army, and other forces that serve the proletariat
and oppressed people. Until workers and oppressed people seize the means
of production, i.e., the banks, factories and distribution centers by
taking state power, no revolutionary country or movement is safe.
The seizure of state power by the oppressed masses is a necessary
precondition to the fundamental transformation of the social relations
inherent under capitalism. The state must be transformed into a body
that no longer manages private property, but rather administers things.
That is, the state must be transformed into an organ of the masses
capable of suppressing the old order and implementing the necessary
economic and political policies of the new. Sanders-style socialism
keeps the old order intact and thus represents a variant of the ruling
capitalist system.
This variant of the capitalist system fits snugly into the Democratic
Party milieu. Sanders has openly endorsed the proxy war on Syria and the
bloody invasion of Yemen currently being conducted by Saudi Arabia. He
has a track record that includes support of the U.S. invasion of
Afghanistan in 2001 and a staunch defense of Israeli expansion in
Palestine.
Sanders’ support of imperialist war is a negation of socialism.
Imperialist war only serves the interests of the ruling capitalist
class, which requires endless warfare in order to expand into new
markets and maintain influence in old ones.
This is not the type of socialism Fidel was defending when he addressed
the Cuban people at close of the 1980s. The Cuban people were defending
revolutionary socialism, a social system that has been in place in Cuba
since 1959. Under revolutionary socialism, Cuban workers hold ownership
over the means of production and plan the economy around the necessities
of housing, health care, and education for all. Cuban socialism has
fulfilled these necessities for the vast majority of Cuban people.
Cuban socialism is rooted in international solidarity, not imperialist
war. Hundreds of thousands of Cubans fought alongside anti-apartheid
forces in South Africa and continue to stand with the peoples of the
world through the administration of free, quality health care. Cuban
socialism is a model for the oppressed.
Even if the Sanders campaign raises domestic issues that a workers’
party would support, his style of socialism is a model for the
oppressor. There should be no question that it is Cuba’s socialism we
defend.
.
← Previous article
Next article →
.
.
Also
From left: Prof. Felix Kury, Kenia Serrano, Clarence Thomas, Delores
Lemon-Thomas, Leima Martinez at Richmond, Calif. meeting, Nov. 13.Photo:
Bill Hackwell
Cubans speak in U.S.: ‘It’s time to end U.S. blockade!’
In a first since the formalization of diplomatic . . .
.
Parliamentary workers on strike.
South Africa: U.S. trade demands compound domestic problems
.
fedexlu107rally
On the picket line
.
.
Workers World video
Activism after Paris
3 days ago
The UN Must Drop G4S
4 days ago
The Decline and Dangers of Iimperialism
4 days ago
519 more
Click image to play video
Watch WWP video on YouTube
PRINT EDITION PDF
.
Copyright © 2015 Workers.org