Speaking strictly for myself, I have been on Hyper Outrage for such a
long time, and on so many critical issues, that I could be consumed by
my own anger, if I allowed it.
The number of critical causes that come across my email each day are
beyond belief.
All I can do is to respond to the root causes rather than to each
outrage. My efforts to stop murder by drones, or be-headings is about
as effective as my preventing the slaughter of Elephants or whales or
Polar Bears. The Internet is ablaze with angry emails. But little
changes. It appears that people do not care, but that is not the real
bottom line. Masses of People are being herded, just as if they were
cattle. They have been told so many lies, and turned in so many
different directions that they finally toss in the towel and muddle
along with the others. Little victories like the blocking of the
Keystone Pipeline, are but glitches along a road well planned by the
Controllers. Personally, I think the human race is coming to an end.
But it will take so much else down with it. We have involved so much
of the Earth's creatures that it is no longer a case of the extinction
of the Dodo Bird or the Passenger Pigeon. When we go down we will
take most everything with us. I personally don't believe we can alter
deeply ingrained beliefs, such as our need to create a Creator, or our
pretense that the wealth we created is real. Too many people muddying
along just trying to survive. No time to think about what we are
doing, just keep the nose to the grindstone and hope for a break.
We just returned from our WCB convention. About 220 people
registered. Most of what we did was superficial. More attention was
given over to instructing us not to eat our salads at the banquet
until the food had been Blessed, than we gave to debating serious
issues. On the surface the conference gave the impression that we
have an active, growing organization. But looking just below the
surface, it is hard to explain what purpose this organization stands
for, other than as a social support group.
And yet, I suspect I'll be there next year. Like the Dodo Bird, I'll
be smiling and bobbing my head along with the rest of the folks.
Carl Jarvis
On 11/10/15, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Where's the Outrage Over the Beheadings in Saudi Arabia?
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/wheres_the_outrage_over_the_beheadings_i
n_saudi_arabia_20151109/
Posted on Nov 9, 2015
By Bill Blum
King Salman of Saudi Arabia meets with President Obama at the White
House in September. (Evan Vucci / AP)
By the time you read this column, Ali Mohammed al-Nimr, Dawoud Hussein
al-Marhoon and Abdullah Hasan al-Zaher may be dead.
In case you've never heard their names, they are young prisoners of
conscience currently housed in solitary confinement at the notorious
al-Ha'ir penitentiary in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. They are waiting to be
beheaded. In all likelihood, as is Saudi custom, no advance public notice
of
their executions will be given. We'll learn of their demise only after the
fact, via social media, or when the Saudi government officially announces
that their sentences have been carried out.
Al-Nimr, al-Marhoon and al-Zaher are Shiite Muslims who were arrested
without warrants at different times in 2012 for participating in
pro-democracy protests in the country's Eastern province during the Arab
Spring uprising of 2011-2012. Al-Nimr and al-Marhoon were 17 years old when
they were apprehended; al-Zaher was 16.
Although approximately 90 percent of the Saudi population consists of Sunni
Muslims, the oil-rich Eastern province is predominantly Shiite. Relations
between the two strands of Islam have never been good in Saudi Arabia, but
tensions have reached a fever pitch in recent years. Branded as apostates
by
prominent Sunni clerics, the Shiites of Saudi Arabia are an oppressed and
segregated minority, historically excluded from access to government
services, jobs and leadership positions and often subject to arbitrary
arrest and imprisonment.
Al-Nimr and his cohorts were held for more than two years in pretrial
detention without access to counsel while they were interrogated and
reportedly tortured into signing confessions. Their alleged crimes,
according to Amnesty International, included "chanting slogans against the
State with the intent of destabilizing the security of the country and
overturning its system of government, participating in the killing of
police
officers by making and using Molotov cocktails to attack them" and
"carrying
out an armed robbery."
Their trials were devoid of the most basic due-process protections.
Predictably, in 2014 all three were convicted and sentenced by the nation's
Specialized Criminal Court in Riyadh to death by beheading. Their
convictions and sentences were subsequently upheld on appeal.
The only difference in the outcome of the three cases is that al-Nimr won't
just have his head lopped off. His body will be crucified afterward and put
on public display as a warning to other would-be troublemakers. Al-Nimr is
the nephew of a leading Shiite spiritual figure-Sheikh Nimr Baqir
al-Nimr-who is also under a death sentence for his vocal criticism of the
monarchy, the House of Saud, which has exercised absolute rule over its
people since 1932.
Saudi Arabia is one of the last nations on earth that stage public
executions. "They are carried out not just in Riyadh, but in other cities,"
Neil Hicks of Human Rights First (HRF) told me in an interview last week.
"In Riyadh, they generally take place after Friday prayers in a downtown
courtyard known locally as 'Chop Square,' when crowds of men are already
gathered in the area and provide a ready audience."
Beheading is the most common method of execution, but other means, such as
firing squads, are occasionally used. Amnesty International reports that in
2014, the Saudis executed 90 people. This year, through Oct. 22, the number
has soared to 137. Apart from China and Iran, no other country consistently
exceeds such totals.
Hicks, who formerly worked as a researcher for the Middle East department
of
Amnesty International in London before becoming director of human rights
promotion at the HRF in New York, says the spike in the Saudi death penalty
is part of a general "clampdown on human rights" that has taken place over
the last three to four years "because the regime is concerned with the
impact of the Arab Spring" and "threats to authoritarian rule." Public
beheadings, he explains, are "meant to keep order and suppress dissent."
Coerced confessions like those extracted from al-Nimr, al-Marhoon and
al-Zaher are a staple of the Saudi justice system, as are closed trials and
appeals. Equally deplorable is the fact that capital crimes are vaguely
defined, ranging from murder and drug smuggling to adultery, apostasy,
witchcraft and sorcery. From 2014 through the middle of this year, nearly
half of those sent to the sword had been convicted of nonlethal,
drug-related crimes.
The Saudi system of executing juveniles also violates international law,
specifically the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Even
the United States-which along with Japan is the last advanced Western-style
democracy that regularly implements capital punishment-has halted the
execution of juvenile offenders as a result of a 2005 Supreme Court
decision
(Roper v. Simmons) declaring the practice unconstitutional.
Women and the mentally disabled, too, are subject to the Saudi death
penalty. In one particularly loathsome case, Rizana Nafeek-a Sri Lankan
woman who had worked as a domestic servant-was beheaded in Dawadmi, a small
town 200 miles west of Riyadh, for causing the death of a 4-month-old baby
in her care. Nafeek claimed the child choked while being bottle-fed. Once
in
custody, she "confessed"-without the assistance of a lawyer or
interpreter-to strangling the infant. The opening stages of Nafeek's
execution were filmed and are available for viewing on YouTube.
In the face of such medieval barbarity, where is the outrage?
To be sure, international human rights organizations have worked hard to
expose the Saudi atrocities. Thus far, however, their pleas to dismantle
the
Saudi killing machine have proved ineffective.
Most shamefully, the Obama administration has declined to speak out.
Although the president has frequently condemned the gruesome beheadings
performed by Islamic State, he has remained mum on Saudi practices.
When White House press secretary Josh Earnest was asked by a reporter in a
Sept. 23 media briefing to comment on the al-Nimr case, he claimed not to
be
"familiar with the intimate details of . the situation." Earnest quickly
added, however, "that the United States, under the leadership of this
president, regularly raises our concerns about the human rights situation
inside of Saudi Arabia."
But even if the U.S. is indeed employing back channels of diplomacy to halt
at least some of the Saudi executions, such efforts are grossly inadequate
and also hypocritical. "The Saudi practices of public beheadings," Hicks
says, "are the pattern that has been followed by [Islamic State] to terrify
and subdue subject populations. This is where [Islamic State] gets its
message from. The Saudis have been doing the exact same thing for decades."
The U.S. refusal to condemn Saudi human rights violations is rooted, of
course, in larger geopolitical machinations. Despite the recent drop in
global commodity prices, the Saudis remain a critical supplier of crude oil
to the West. Even more critically, the Saudis are viewed as a vital
American
military ally-second only to Israel in the Middle East-in the all-purpose
and never-ending war on terror.
Since October 2010, according to the Congressional Research Service, the
Saudis have purchased more than $90 billion in fighter aircraft,
helicopters, missile defense systems, missiles, bombs, armored vehicles and
related equipment from such American defense manufacturers as Raytheon,
Boeing and Lockheed Martin. Since March of this year, U.S.-trained Saudi
military personnel have deployed such equipment to launch a vicious
air-bombardment campaign against Shiite Houthi rebel groups in Yemen.
Although the Obama administration lacks the courage and decency to come
forward, the rest of us have no reason to be constrained. Campaigns to free
al-Nimr and his compatriots confined on Saudi Arabia's death row are
underway and deserve our active participation.
The first step in ending tyranny is to expose its existence-to let the
tyrants know that we're watching and won't turn away until they are forced
to change their ways or stand down once and for all.
http://www.truthdig.com/ http://www.truthdig.com/
Where's the Outrage Over the Beheadings in Saudi Arabia?
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/wheres_the_outrage_over_the_beheadings_i
n_saudi_arabia_20151109/
Posted on Nov 9, 2015
By Bill Blum
King Salman of Saudi Arabia meets with President Obama at the White House
in
September. (Evan Vucci / AP)
By the time you read this column, Ali Mohammed al-Nimr, Dawoud Hussein
al-Marhoon and Abdullah Hasan al-Zaher may be dead.
In case you've never heard their names, they are young prisoners of
conscience currently housed in solitary confinement at the notorious
al-Ha'ir penitentiary in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. They are waiting to be
beheaded. In all likelihood, as is Saudi custom, no advance public notice
of
their executions will be given. We'll learn of their demise only after the
fact, via social media, or when the Saudi government officially announces
that their sentences have been carried out.
Al-Nimr, al-Marhoon and al-Zaher are Shiite Muslims who were arrested
without warrants at different times in 2012 for participating in
pro-democracy protests in the country's Eastern province during the Arab
Spring uprising of 2011-2012. Al-Nimr and al-Marhoon were 17 years old when
they were apprehended; al-Zaher was 16.
Although approximately 90 percent of the Saudi population consists of Sunni
Muslims, the oil-rich Eastern province is predominantly Shiite. Relations
between the two strands of Islam have never been good in Saudi Arabia, but
tensions have reached a fever pitch in recent years. Branded as apostates
by
prominent Sunni clerics, the Shiites of Saudi Arabia are an oppressed and
segregated minority, historically excluded from access to government
services, jobs and leadership positions and often subject to arbitrary
arrest and imprisonment.
Al-Nimr and his cohorts were held for more than two years in pretrial
detention without access to counsel while they were interrogated and
reportedly tortured into signing confessions. Their alleged crimes,
according to Amnesty International, included "chanting slogans against the
State with the intent of destabilizing the security of the country and
overturning its system of government, participating in the killing of
police
officers by making and using Molotov cocktails to attack them" and
"carrying
out an armed robbery."
Their trials were devoid of the most basic due-process protections.
Predictably, in 2014 all three were convicted and sentenced by the nation's
Specialized Criminal Court in Riyadh to death by beheading. Their
convictions and sentences were subsequently upheld on appeal.
The only difference in the outcome of the three cases is that al-Nimr won't
just have his head lopped off. His body will be crucified afterward and put
on public display as a warning to other would-be troublemakers. Al-Nimr is
the nephew of a leading Shiite spiritual figure-Sheikh Nimr Baqir
al-Nimr-who is also under a death sentence for his vocal criticism of the
monarchy, the House of Saud, which has exercised absolute rule over its
people since 1932.
Saudi Arabia is one of the last nations on earth that stage public
executions. "They are carried out not just in Riyadh, but in other cities,"
Neil Hicks of Human Rights First (HRF) told me in an interview last week.
"In Riyadh, they generally take place after Friday prayers in a downtown
courtyard known locally as 'Chop Square,' when crowds of men are already
gathered in the area and provide a ready audience."
Beheading is the most common method of execution, but other means, such as
firing squads, are occasionally used. Amnesty International reports that in
2014, the Saudis executed 90 people. This year, through Oct. 22, the number
has soared to 137. Apart from China and Iran, no other country consistently
exceeds such totals.
Hicks, who formerly worked as a researcher for the Middle East department
of
Amnesty International in London before becoming director of human rights
promotion at the HRF in New York, says the spike in the Saudi death penalty
is part of a general "clampdown on human rights" that has taken place over
the last three to four years "because the regime is concerned with the
impact of the Arab Spring" and "threats to authoritarian rule." Public
beheadings, he explains, are "meant to keep order and suppress dissent."
Coerced confessions like those extracted from al-Nimr, al-Marhoon and
al-Zaher are a staple of the Saudi justice system, as are closed trials and
appeals. Equally deplorable is the fact that capital crimes are vaguely
defined, ranging from murder and drug smuggling to adultery, apostasy,
witchcraft and sorcery. From 2014 through the middle of this year, nearly
half of those sent to the sword had been convicted of nonlethal,
drug-related crimes.
The Saudi system of executing juveniles also violates international law,
specifically the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Even
the United States-which along with Japan is the last advanced Western-style
democracy that regularly implements capital punishment-has halted the
execution of juvenile offenders as a result of a 2005 Supreme Court
decision
(Roper v. Simmons) declaring the practice unconstitutional.
Women and the mentally disabled, too, are subject to the Saudi death
penalty. In one particularly loathsome case, Rizana Nafeek-a Sri Lankan
woman who had worked as a domestic servant-was beheaded in Dawadmi, a small
town 200 miles west of Riyadh, for causing the death of a 4-month-old baby
in her care. Nafeek claimed the child choked while being bottle-fed. Once
in
custody, she "confessed"-without the assistance of a lawyer or
interpreter-to strangling the infant. The opening stages of Nafeek's
execution were filmed and are available for viewing on YouTube.
In the face of such medieval barbarity, where is the outrage?
To be sure, international human rights organizations have worked hard to
expose the Saudi atrocities. Thus far, however, their pleas to dismantle
the
Saudi killing machine have proved ineffective.
Most shamefully, the Obama administration has declined to speak out.
Although the president has frequently condemned the gruesome beheadings
performed by Islamic State, he has remained mum on Saudi practices.
When White House press secretary Josh Earnest was asked by a reporter in a
Sept. 23 media briefing to comment on the al-Nimr case, he claimed not to
be
"familiar with the intimate details of . the situation." Earnest quickly
added, however, "that the United States, under the leadership of this
president, regularly raises our concerns about the human rights situation
inside of Saudi Arabia."
But even if the U.S. is indeed employing back channels of diplomacy to halt
at least some of the Saudi executions, such efforts are grossly inadequate
and also hypocritical. "The Saudi practices of public beheadings," Hicks
says, "are the pattern that has been followed by [Islamic State] to terrify
and subdue subject populations. This is where [Islamic State] gets its
message from. The Saudis have been doing the exact same thing for decades."
The U.S. refusal to condemn Saudi human rights violations is rooted, of
course, in larger geopolitical machinations. Despite the recent drop in
global commodity prices, the Saudis remain a critical supplier of crude oil
to the West. Even more critically, the Saudis are viewed as a vital
American
military ally-second only to Israel in the Middle East-in the all-purpose
and never-ending war on terror.
Since October 2010, according to the Congressional Research Service, the
Saudis have purchased more than $90 billion in fighter aircraft,
helicopters, missile defense systems, missiles, bombs, armored vehicles and
related equipment from such American defense manufacturers as Raytheon,
Boeing and Lockheed Martin. Since March of this year, U.S.-trained Saudi
military personnel have deployed such equipment to launch a vicious
air-bombardment campaign against Shiite Houthi rebel groups in Yemen.
Although the Obama administration lacks the courage and decency to come
forward, the rest of us have no reason to be constrained. Campaigns to free
al-Nimr and his compatriots confined on Saudi Arabia's death row are
underway and deserve our active participation.
The first step in ending tyranny is to expose its existence-to let the
tyrants know that we're watching and won't turn away until they are forced
to change their ways or stand down once and for all.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/own_a_vizio_smart_tv_its_watching_you_20
151110/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/own_a_vizio_smart_tv_its_watching_you_20
151110/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/own_a_vizio_smart_tv_its_watching_you_20
151110/
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/video_trevor_noah_mizzou_football_team_
teaching_america_protest_20151110/
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/video_trevor_noah_mizzou_football_team_
teaching_america_protest_20151110/
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/video_trevor_noah_mizzou_football_team_
teaching_america_protest_20151110/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/what_obama_should_tell_netanyahu_this_we
ek_but_wont_20151110/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/what_obama_should_tell_netanyahu_this_we
ek_but_wont_20151110/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/what_obama_should_tell_netanyahu_this_we
ek_but_wont_20151110/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/what_i_learned_during_my_time_in_the_red
_states_20151110/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/what_i_learned_during_my_time_in_the_red
_states_20151110/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/what_i_learned_during_my_time_in_the_red
_states_20151110/ http://www.truthdig.com/ http://www.truthdig.com/
http://www.truthdig.com/about/http://www.truthdig.com/contact/http://www.tru
thdig.com/about/advertising/http://www.truthdig.com/user_agreement/http://ww
w.truthdig.com/privacy_policy/http://www.truthdig.com/about/comment_policy/
C 2015 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
http://www.hopstudios.com/
http://support.truthdig.com/signup_page/subscribe
http://support.truthdig.com/signup_page/subscribe
http://www.facebook.com/truthdighttp://twitter.com/intent/follow?source=foll
owbutton&variant=1.0&screen_name=truthdighttps://plus.google.com/+truthdight
tp://www.linkedin.com/company/truthdighttp://truthdig.tumblr.com/http://www.
truthdig.com/connect
