Annotated Game #137: Reuben Fine - Mikhail Botvinnik, Amsterdam 1938 Adapted and Condensed from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Contents: ++1. Reuben Fine ++1.A Biography ++1.A1 Teenage Master ++1.A2 U.S. Open Champion ++1.A3 Olympiad brilliance ++1.A4 North American successes ++1.A5 Narrow misses at U.S. Championship ++1.A6 International triumphs ++1.A7 AVRO showdown ++1.A8 Wartime years ++1.A9 After the war ++1.A10 1948 World Championship ++1.B Chess record ++1.B1 Lifetime scores against top players ++1.B2 Top ten for eight years ++1.B3 Notable games ++1.C Psychologist ++1.D Books by Reuben Fine ++1.D1 On chess ++1.D2 On psychology ++2. Mikhail Moiseyevich Botvinnik ++2.A Early years ++2.B Soviet champion ++2.C World title contender ++2.D World Champion ++2.E Team tournaments ++2.F Late career ++2.G Political controversies ++2.H Assessment ++2.H1 Playing strength and style ++2.H2 Influence on the game ++2.I Other achievements ++2.I1 Electrical engineering ++2.I2 Computer chess ++2.J Writings ++2.J1 Chess ++2.J2 Computers ++2.K Notable chess games ++2.L Tournament results ++2.L1 Match results ++3. Reuben Fine - Mikhail Botvinnik, Amsterdam 1938 ++1. Reuben Fine Reuben Fine (October 11, 1914 - March 26, 1993) was one of the strongest chess players in the world from the mid-1930s through the 1940s, an International Grandmaster, psychologist and author of books on both chess and psychology. Fine won five medals (four gold) in three chess Olympiads. Fine won the U.S. Open Chess Championship all seven times he entered (1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1939, 1940, 1941). He was the author of several chess books that are still popular today, including important books on the chess endgame, opening, and middlegame. He earned a bachelor's degree from the City College of New York in 1932. After World War II, he earned his doctorate in psychology, and wrote many successful books in that field as well. Although he was regarded as a serious contender for the World Chess Championship, he declined his invitation to participate in the six-player 1948 match-tournament to determine the World Champion after the death of reigning champion Alexander Alekhine. ++1.A Biography ++1.A1 Teenage Master Fine was born in New York City to a poor Russian-Jewish family. He learned to play chess at age eight, and began tournament-level chess at the famous Marshall Chess Club in New York City, stomping grounds for many famous grandmasters such as Bobby Fischer, later on. At this stage of his career, Fine played a great deal of blitz chess, and he eventually became one of the best blitz players in the world. Even in the early 1930s, he could nearly hold his own in blitz chess against the then world chess champion Alexander Alekhine, although Fine admitted that the few times he played Alekhine's predecessor Jose Raul Capablanca, the latter beat him "mercilessly". Fine's first significant master-level event was the 1930 New York Young Masters tournament, which was won by Arthur Dake. He narrowly lost a 1931 stakes match to fellow New Yorker Arnold Denker. Fine placed second at the 1931 New York State Championship with 8/11, behind Fred Reinfeld. Fine won the 15th Marshall Chess Club Championship of 1931 with 10.5/13, half a point ahead of Reinfeld. He defeated Herman Steiner by 5.5-4.5 at New York 1932; this was the first of three matches the two players would contest. ++1.A2 U.S. Open Champion At seventeen, Fine won his first of seven U.S. Open Chess Championships at Minneapolis 1932 with 9.5/11, half a point ahead of Samuel Reshevsky; this tournament was known as the Western Open at the time. Fine played in his first top-class international tournament at Pasadena 1932, where he shared 7-10th with 5/11; the winner was world chess champion Alexander Alekhine. Fine repeated as champion in the 16th Marshall Club Championship, held from Oct.- Dec. 1932, with 11.5/13, 2.5 points ahead of the runner-up. After graduating from City College of New York in 1932, at age 18, where he was a brilliant student, and where he captained CCNY to the 1931 National Collegiate team title, Fine decided to try the life of a chess professional for a few years. ++1.A3 Olympiad brilliance Fine won the U.S. Team Selection tournament, New York 1933, with 8/10. This earned him the first of three national team berths for the chess Olympiads. Fine won five medals (including three team golds) representing the United States; his detailed record follows (from olimpbase.org). His totals are (+20 =19 -6), for 65.6 per cent. * Folkestone 1933: board three, 9/13 (+6 =6 -1), team gold, board silver; * Warsaw 1935: board one, 9/17 (+5 =8 -4), team gold; * Stockholm 1937: board two, 11.5/15 (+9 =5 -1), team gold, board gold. ++1.A4 North American successes Fine repeated as champion at the U.S./Western Open, Detroit 1933, with 12/13, half a point ahead of Reshevsky. Fine won the 17th Marshall Club Championship, 1933-34, with 9.5/11. He defeated Al Horowitz in a match at New York 1934 by 6-3. Fine shared 1st-2nd places at the U.S./Western Open, Chicago 1934, on 7.5/9, with Reshevsky. He then shared 1st-3rd places at Mexico City 1934, on 11/12, with Herman Steiner and Arthur Dake. At Syracuse 1934, Fine shared 3rd-4th places, on 10/14, as Reshevsky won. Fine won his fourth straight U.S./Western Open at Milwaukee 1935, scoring 6.5/9 in the preliminary round, and then 8/10 in the finals. Having had outstanding successes in North America, Fine tried his first European individual international tournament at Lodz 1935, where he shared 2nd-3rd places with 6/9 behind Savielly Tartakower. Fine won the Hastings 1935-1936 with 7.5/9, a point ahead of Salo Flohr. ++1.A5 Narrow misses at U.S. Championship Although Fine was active and very successful in U.S. open tournaments, he was never able to finish first in the U.S. Championship, usually placing behind his great American rival, Samuel Reshevsky. When in 1936 Frank Marshall voluntarily gave up the American Championship title he had held since 1909, the result was the first modern U.S. Championship tournament. Fine scored 10.5/15 in the U.S. Championship, New York 1936, a tied 3rd-4th place, as Reshevsky won. In the U.S. Championship, New York 1938, Fine placed 2nd with 12.5/16, with Reshevsky repeating as champion. In the U.S. Championship, New York 1940, Fine again scored 12.5/16 for 2nd, as Reshevsky won for the third straight time. Then in the 1944 U.S. Championship at New York, Fine scored 14.5/17 for 2nd, though losing to Denker, as the latter won. Fine tallied 50/64 in his four U.S. title attempts, for 78.1 per cent, but was never champion. ++1.A6 International triumphs However, Fine's international tournament record in the 1930s was superior to Reshevsky's. By the end of 1937, Fine had won a string of strong European international tournaments, and was one of the most successful players in the world. Fine won at Oslo 1936 with 6.5/7, half a point ahead of Flohr. Fine captured Zandvoort 1936 with 8.5/11, ahead of World Champion Max Euwe, Savielly Tartakower, and Paul Keres. Fine shared 3rd-5th places at the elite Nottingham 1936 event with 9.5/14, half a point behind winners Jose Raul Capablanca and Mikhail Botvinnik. Fine shared 1st-2nd places at Amsterdam 1936 on 5/7 with Euwe, half a point ahead of Alekhine. Fine placed 2nd at Hastings 1936-1937 with 7.5/9, as Alekhine won. The year 1937 would be Fine's most successful. He won at Leningrad 1937 with 4/5, ahead of Grigory Levenfish, who would come joint first in that year's Soviet Championship. Fine won at Moscow 1937 with 5/7. Those two victories make Fine one of a very few foreigners to win on Russian soil. Fine shared 1st-2nd places at Margate 1937 with Paul Keres on 7.5/9, 1.5 points ahead of Alekhine. Fine shared 1st-3rd places at Ostend 1937 with Paul Keres and Henry Grob on 6/9. At Stockholm 1937, Fine won with 8/9, 1.5 points ahead of Gideon Stahlberg. Fine then defeated Stahlberg by 5-3 in a match held at Goteborg 1937. Fine placed 2nd at the elite Semmering/Baden 1937 tournament with 8/14, behind Paul Keres. At Kemeri 1937, Fine had a rare relatively weak result, with just 9/17 for 8th place, as the title was shared by Reshevsky, Flohr, and Vladimir Petrov. Fine shared 4-5th places at Hastings 1937-38 with 6/9 as Reshevsky won. ++1.A7 AVRO showdown In 1938, Fine tied for first place with Paul Keres in the prestigious AVRO tournament in the Netherlands, on 8.5/14, with Keres placed first on tiebreak. This was one of the most famous tournaments of the 20th century, and some believe to this day that it is the strongest tournament ever staged. It was organized with the hope that the winner of AVRO, a double round-robin tournament, would be the next challenger to world champion Alexander Alekhine. Fine finished ahead of future champion Mikhail Botvinnik, current champion Alekhine, former world champions Max Euwe and Capablanca, and Grandmasters Samuel Reshevsky and Salo Flohr. Fine won both of his games against Alekhine. ++1.A8 Wartime years As World War II interrupted any prospects for a world championship match, Fine turned to chess writing. In 1941 he wrote Basic Chess Endings, a compendium of endgame analysis which, more than 60 years later, is still considered one of the best works on this subject. His The Ideas Behind the Chess Openings, though badly dated, is still useful for grasping the underlying ideas of many standard chess openings. During World War II, Fine worked for the U.S. Navy, performing the task of calculating the probability of German U- boats surfacing at certain points in the water. Fine also worked as a translator. Fine was unable to compete in Europe during the war, since it was cut off by the German naval blockade. However, Fine did play a few serious American events during World War II, and continued his successes, but there was little prize money even for winning. He won the U.S. Open at New York 1939 with 10.5/11, half a point ahead of Reshevsky. In the 23rd Marshall Club Championship of 1939, Fine won with 14/16. He won the 1940 U.S. Open at Dallas with a perfect 8/8 in the finals, three points ahead of Herman Steiner. Fine won the New York State Championship, Hamilton 1941, with 8/10, a point ahead of Reshevsky, Denker, and Isaac Kashdan. Fine won the 1941 Marshall Club Championship with 14/15, ahead of Frank Marshall. Fine won the 1941 U.S. Open at St. Louis, with 4/5 in the preliminaries, and 8/9 in the finals. Fine won the 1942 Washington, D.C. Chess Divan title with a perfect 7/7. He defeated Herman Steiner in match play for the second time by 3.5-0.5 at Washington 1944. Fine won the U.S. Speed Championships of both 1944 (10/11) and 1945 (10/11). In the Pan- American Championship, Hollywood 1945, Fine placed 2nd with 9/12 behind Reshevsky. He played in the 1945 USA vs USSR Radio team match, scoring 0.5/2 on board three against Isaac Boleslavsky. Then Fine travelled to Europe one last time to compete, in the 1946 Moscow team match against the USSR, scoring 0.5/2 on board three against Paul Keres. ++1.A9 After the war As the war ended in late 1945, Fine was working on his doctorate in psychology. Once he completed this, he again played some competitive chess. He won at New York 1948 with 8/9, ahead of Miguel Najdorf, Max Euwe, and Herman Pilnik. Fine drew a match by 4-4 against Najdorf at New York 1949. He participated in the 1950 radio match USA vs Yugoslavia, drawing his game. Fine was named an International Grandmaster in 1950, on the inaugural list from the FIDE, the World Chess Federation. His last significant tournament was the Maurice Wertheim Memorial at New York 1951, where he scored 7/11 for 4th, as Reshevsky won. ++1.A10 1948 World Championship After Alekhine died in 1946, FIDE (the World Chess Organization) organized a World Chess Championship tournament to determine the new champion. As co-winner in the AVRO tournament, Fine was invited to participate, but he declined, for reasons that are the subject of speculation. Fine had played a third match against Herman Steiner at Los Angeles 1947, winning 5-1; this match was training for his potential world championship appearance. Publicly, Fine stated that he could not interrupt work on his doctoral dissertation in psychology. Negotiations over the tournament had been protracted, and for a long time it was unclear whether this World Championship event would in fact take place. Fine wrote that he didn't want to spend many months preparing and then see the tournament cancelled. However, it has also been suggested that Fine declined to play because he suspected there would be collaboration among the three Soviet participants to ensure that one of them won the championship. In the August 2004 issue of Chess Life, for example, GM Larry Evans gave his recollection that "Fine told me he didn't want to waste three months of his life watching Russians throw games to each other." Fine's 1951 written statement on the matter in his book "The World's Greatest Chess Games" was: "Unfortunately for the Western masters the Soviet political organization was stronger than that of the West. The U.S. Chess Federation was a meaningless paper organization, generally antagonistic to the needs of its masters. The Dutch Chess Federation did not choose to act. The FIDE was impotent. The result was a rescheduling of the tournament for the following year, with the vital difference that now half was to be played in Holland, half in the U.S.S.R. Dissatisfied with this arrangement and the general tenor of the event, I withdrew." Edward Winter discusses the evidence further in a 2007 Chessbase column. ++1.B Chess record ++1.B1 Lifetime scores against top players Fine had a relatively short career in top-level chess, but scored very impressively against top players. He faced five World Champions: Emanuel Lasker (+1 =0 -0); Jose Raul Capablanca (+0 =5 -0); Alexander Alekhine (+3 =4 -2); Max Euwe (+2 =3 -2); and Mikhail Botvinnik (+1 =2 -0). His main American rivals were Samuel Reshevsky (+3 =12 -4); Herman Steiner (+21 =8 -4); Isaac Kashdan (+6 =6 -1); Albert Simonson (+6 =1 -1); Al Horowitz (+10 =7 -2); Arnold Denker (+7 =7 -6); Fred Reinfeld (+10 =7 -5); and Arthur Dake (a shocking +7 =5 -7, but three losses as a sixteen year old against Dake in his twenties). Internationally, Fine faced the best of his time, and usually more than held his own, with three exceptions. He struggled against Paul Keres (+1 =8 -3); Milan Vidmar (+0 =2 -1); and Isaac Boleslavsky (+0 =1 -1). But he handled everyone else: Miguel Najdorf (+3 =5 -3); Savielly Tartakower (+2 =4 -1); Salo Flohr (+2 =7 -0); Grigory Levenfish (+1 =0 -0); George Alan Thomas (+2 =3 -0); Erich Eliskases (+1 =2 -0); Viacheslav Ragozin (+1 =1 -0); Vladimir Petrov (+2 =1 -1); Efim Bogolyubov (+1 =1 -0); Jan Foltys (+2 =0 -0); Salo Landau (+4 -0 =1); George Koltanowski (+2 =1 -0); Igor Bondarevsky (+1 =0 -0); Giza Maroczy (+1 =0 -0); William Winter (+4 =0 -0); Ernst Gruenfeld (+1 =0 -0); Gideon Stahlberg (+4 =5 -2); Andor Lilienthal (+1 =0 -0); Laszlo Szabo (+0 =1 -0); Vladas Mikenas (+1 =1 -0); Rudolph Spielmann (+0 =1 -0); and Conel Hugh O'Donel Alexander (+1 =3 -0). Finally, against the new generation of American masters which emerged in the late 1940s, Fine proved he could still perform well: Arthur Bisguier (+1 =1 -0); Larry Evans (+0 =2 -0); George Kramer (+1 =1 -0); and Robert Byrne (+0 =1 -0). ++1.B2 Top ten for eight years Although FIDE, the World Chess Federation, did not formally introduce chess ratings for international play until 1970, it is nevertheless possible to retrospectively rate players' performances from before that time. The site chessmetrics.com, which specializes in historical ratings throughout chess history, ranks Fine in the world's top ten players for more than eight years, from March 1936 until October 1942, and then again from January 1949 until December 1950. Between those two periods, he was less active as a player, so his ranking dropped. Fine was #1 in the world from October 1940 until March 1941, was in the top three from December 1938 until June 1942, and reached his peak rating of 2762 in July 1941. However, chessmetrics.com is missing several of Fine's major events from its database. ++1.B3 Notable games * Reuben Fine vs Mikhail Botvinnik, Amsterdam AVRO 1938, French Defence, Winawer/Advance Variation (C17), 1-0 In the final position, "Black does not have a single move, and Rf3 is threatened. A combination of a splendid strategic idea with tactical subtleties." (Botvinnik) * Reuben Fine vs Salomon Flohr, Amsterdam AVRO 1938, French Defence, Winawer/Advance Variation (C17), 1-0 Deep tactics in an unusual variant of French Defense. * Reuben Fine vs Herman Steiner, Pan-American champ, Hollywood 1945. Queen's Gambit Accepted, Classical (D29), 1-0 Fine sees further than his opponent in a sharp tactical position. ++1.C Psychologist After receiving his doctorate in psychology from the University of Southern California, Fine abandoned professional chess to concentrate on his new profession. Fine continued playing chess casually throughout his life (including several friendly games played in 1963 against Bobby Fischer, one of which is included in Fischer's My 60 Memorable Games). In 1956 he wrote an article, "Psychoanalytic Observations on Chess and Chess Masters", for a psychological journal. Later, Fine turned the article into a book, The Psychology of the Chess Player, in which he provided insights steeped in Freudian theory. (Fine is not the first person to examine the mind as it relates to chess--Alfred Binet, the inventor of the IQ test, had studied the mental functionality of good chess players, and found that they often had enhanced mental traits, such as a good memory.) He went on to publish A History of Psychoanalysis (1979) and a number of other books on psychology. As did many psychoanalysts of his day, Fine believed that homosexuality could be "cured" (through conversion therapy), and his opinions on the subject were cited in legal battles over homosexuality, including the legislative battle over same-sex marriage in Hawaii. Fine served as a visiting professor at CCNY, the University of Amsterdam, the Lowell Institute of Technology, and the University of Florence. Fine founded the Creative Living Center in New York City. ++1.D Books by Reuben Fine ++1.D1 On chess * Basic Chess Endings, by Reuben Fine, 1941, McKay. Revised in 2003 by Pal Benko. ISBN 0-8129-3493-8. * The Ideas Behind the Chess Openings, by Reuben Fine, 1943. Revised in 1989. McKay, ISBN 0-8129-1756-1. * Practical Chess Openings, by Reuben Fine. * The Middlegame in Chess, by Reuben Fine. ISBN 0-8129-3484-9. * Modern Chess Openings, sixth Edition, by Reuben Fine. * Chess the Easy Way, by Reuben Fine, 1942. 1986 Paperback re- issue. ISBN 0-6716-2427-X * Chess Marches On, by Reuben Fine, 1946. * Dr. Lasker's Chess Career, by Reuben Fine and Fred Reinfeld, 1935. * Lessons From My Games, by Reuben Fine, 1958. * The Psychology of the Chess Player, by Reuben Fine, 1967. * Bobby Fischer's Conquest of the World's Chess Championship: The Psychology and Tactics of the Title Match, by Reuben Fine, 1973. ISBN 0923891471 * The World's Great Chess Games, by Reuben Fine; Dover; 1983. ISBN 0-486-24512-8. ++1.D2 On psychology * Freud: a Critical Re-evaluation of his Theories, by Reuben Fine (1962). * The Healing of the Mind, by Reuben Fine (1971). * The Development of Freud's Thought, by Reuben Fine (1973). * Psychoanalytic Psychology, by Reuben Fine (1975). * The History of nalPsychoaysis, by Reuben Fine (1979). * The Psychoanalytic Vision, by Reuben Fine (1981). * The Logic of Psychology, by Reuben Fine (1985). * The Meaning of Love in Human Experience, by Reuben Fine (1985). * Narcissism, the Self, and Society, by Reuben Fine (1986). * The Forgotten Man: Understanding the Male Psyche, by Reuben Fine (1987). ++2. Mikhail Moiseyevich Botvinnik Mikhail Moiseyevich Botvinnik, Ph.D. (August 17 (August 4?) 1911 - May 5, 1995) was a Soviet and Russian International Grandmaster and three-time World Chess Champion. Working as an electrical engineer and computer scientist at the same time, he was one of the very few famous chess players who achieved distinction in another career while playing top-class competitive chess. He also developed a chess-playing algorithm that tried to "think" like a top human player, but this approach has been superseded by a brute-force search strategy that exploits the rapid increase in the calculation speed of modern computers. Botvinnik was the first world-class player to develop within the Soviet Union (Alekhine was a top player before the Russian Revolution), putting him under political pressure but also giving him considerable influence within Soviet chess. From time to time he was accused of using that influence to his own advantage, but the evidence is unclear and some suggest he resisted attempts by Soviet officials to intimidate some of his rivals. Botvinnik also played a major role in the organization of chess, making a significant contribution to the design of the World Chess Championship system after World War II and becoming a leading member of the coaching system that enabled the Soviet Union to dominate top-class chess during that time. His famous pupils include World Champions Anatoly Karpov, Garry Kasparov and Vladimir Kramnik. Playing top class chess for decades, being an eminent chess author, one of the pioneers of computer chess, and a great chess teacher in his late years, Botvinnik is widely regarded as the most influential chess contributor in the 20th century. ++2.A Early years Mikhail Moiseyevich Botvinnik was born on August 17, 1911, in what was then Kuokkala in the Russian-controlled but autonomous Grand Duchy of Finland, but is now the district of Repino in Saint Petersburg. Although his parents were Jewish, his father was a dental technician and his mother a dentist, which allowed the family to live outside the Pale of Settlement to which most Jews in the Russian Empire were restricted at the time. As a result, Mikhail Botvinnik grew up in Saint Petersburg's Nevsky Prospekt. His father forbade the speaking of Yiddish at home, and Mikhail and his older brother Issy attended Soviet schools. Mikhail Botvinnik later said, "I am a Jew by blood, Russian by culture, Soviet by upbringing." In 1920, his mother became ill and his father left the family, but maintained contact with the children, even after his second marriage, to a Russian woman. At about the same time, Mikhail started reading newspapers, and became a committed Communist. In autumn 1923, at the age of twelve, Mikhail Botvinnik was taught chess by a school friend of his older brother, using a home-made set, and instantly fell in love with the game. He finished in mid- table in the school championship, sought advice from another of his brother's friends, and concluded that for him it was better to think out "concrete concepts" and then derive general principles from these - and went on to beat his brother's friend quite easily. In winter 1924, Botvinnik won his school's championship, and exaggerated his age by three years in order to become a member of the Petrograd Chess Assembly - to which the Assembly's President turned a blind eye. Botvinnik won his first two tournaments organized by the Assembly. Shortly afterwards, Nikolai Krylenko, a chess fanatic and leading member of the Soviet legal system who later organized Joseph Stalin's show trials, began building a huge nation-wide chess organization, and the Assembly was replaced by a club in the city's Palace of Labor. To test the strength of Soviet chess masters, Krylenko organized the Moscow 1925 chess tournament. On a rest day during the event, world champion José Raúl Capablanca gave a simultaneous exhibition in Leningrad. Botvinnik was selected as one of his opponents, and won their game. In 1926, he reached the final stage of the Leningrad championship. Later that year, he was selected for Leningrad's team in a match against Stockholm, held in Sweden, and scored +1 =1 against the future grandmaster Gösta Stoltz. On his return, he entertained his schoolmates with a vivid account of the rough sea journey back to Russia. Botvinnik was commissioned to annotate two games from the match, and the fact that his analyses were to be published made him aware of the need for objectivity. In December 1926, he became a candidate member of his school's Komsomol branch. Around this time his mother became concerned about his poor physique, and as a result he started a program of daily exercise, which he maintained for most of his life. Botvinnik in 1927When Botvinnik finished the school curriculum, he was below the minimum age for the entrance examinations for higher education. While waiting, he qualified for his first USSR Championship final stage in 1927 as the youngest player ever at that time, tied for fifth place and won the title of National Master. He wanted to study Electrical Technology at the Leningrad Polytechnical Institute and passed the entrance examination; however, there was a persistent excess of applications for this course and the Prolestud, which controlled admissions, had a policy of admitting only children of engineers and industrial workers. After an appeal by a local chess official, he was admitted in 1928 to Leningrad University's Mathematics Department. In January 1929, Botvinnik played for Leningrad in the student team chess championship against Moscow. Leningrad won and the team manager, who was also Deputy Chairman of the Prolestud, secured Botvinnik a transfer to the Polytechnic's Electromechanical Department, where he was one of only four students who entered straight from school. As a result, he had to do a whole year's work in five months, and failed one of the examinations. Early in the same year he placed joint third in the semi-final stage of the USSR Championship, and thus failed to reach the final stage. His early progress was fairly rapid, mostly under the training of Soviet Master and coach Abram Model, in Leningrad; Model taught Botvinnik the Winawer Variation of the French Defence, then regarded as inferior for Black, but which Model and Botvinnik analyzed more deeply, and then played with great success. He won the Leningrad Masters' tournament in 1930 with 6½/8, following this up the next year by winning the Championship of Leningrad by 2½ points over former Soviet champion Peter Romanovsky. His wife was a Russian named Gayane (Ganna) Davidovna, the daughter of his algebra and geometry teacher. She was a student at the Vaganova Academy of Russian Ballet in Leningrad and later, a ballerina in the Bolshoi Theatre. They had one daughter named Olga, born in 1941. ++2.B Soviet champion In 1931, at the age of 20, Botvinnik won his first Soviet Championship in Moscow, scoring 13½ out of 17. He commented that the field was not very strong, as some of the pre-Revolution masters were absent. In late summer 1931, he graduated with a degree in Electrical Engineering, after completing a practical assignment on temporary transmission lines at the Dnieper Hydroelectric Station. He stayed on at the Leningrad Polytechnical Institute to study for a Candidate's degree. In 1933, he repeated his Soviet Championship win, in his home city of Leningrad, with 14/19, describing the results as evidence that Krylenko's plan to develop a new generation of Soviet masters had borne fruit. He and other young masters successfully requested the support of a senior Leningrad Communist Party official in arranging contests involving both Soviet and foreign players, as there had been none since the Moscow 1925 chess tournament. Soon afterwards, Botvinnik was informed that Alexander Ilyin-Genevsky, one of the older masters and a member of the Soviet embassy in Prague, had arranged a match between Salo Flohr and himself, with his opponent then regarded as one of the most credible contenders for Alexander Alekhine's World Chess Championship title. The highest-level chess officials in the Soviet Union opposed this on the grounds that Botvinnik stood little chance against such a strong opponent, which caused Krylenko to insist on the match, saying that "We have to know our real strength." Botvinnik used what he regarded as the first version of his method of preparing for a contest, but fell two games behind by the end of the first six, played in Moscow. However, aided by his old friend Ragozin and coach Abram Model, he leveled the score in Leningrad and the match was drawn. When describing the post-match party, Botvinnik wrote that at the time he danced the foxtrot and Charleston to a professional standard. In his first tournament outside the USSR, the Hastings 1934-1935, Botvinnik achieved only a tie for 5th-6th places, with 5/9. He wrote that, in London after the tournament, Emanuel Lasker said his arrival only two hours before the first round began was a serious mistake and that he should have allowed ten days for acclimatization. Botvinnik wrote that he did not make this mistake again. Botvinnik placed first equal with Flohr, ½ point ahead of Lasker and one point ahead of José Raúl Capablanca, in Moscow's second International Tournament, held in 1935. After consulting Capablanca and Lasker, Krylenko proposed to award Botvinnik the title grandmaster, but Botvinnik objected that "titles were not the point." However, he accepted a free car and a 67% increase in his postgraduate study grant, both provided by the People's Commissariat of Heavy Industry. Botvinnik vs Lasker in 1936He later reported to Krylenko that the 1935 tournament made it difficult to judge the strength of the top Soviet players, as it included a mixture of top-class and weaker players. Botvinnik advocated a double round-robin event featuring the top five Soviet players and the five strongest non-Soviet players available. Despite politicking over the Soviet choices, both Krylenko and the Central Committee of the Komsomol quickly authorised the tournament. This was played in Moscow in June 1936,and Botvinnik finished second, one point behind Capablanca and 2 ahead of Flohr. However, he took consolation from the fact the Soviet Union's best had held their own against top-class competition. In early winter, 1936, Botvinnik was invited to play in a tournament at Nottingham, England. Krylenko authorized his participation and, to help Botvinnik play at his best, allowed Botvinnik's wife to accompany him - a privilege rarely extended to chess players at any time in Soviet history. Taking Lasker's advice, Botvinnik arrived ten days before play started. Although his Soviet rivals forecast disaster for him, he scored an undefeated shared first place (+6 =8) with Capablanca, ½ point ahead of current World Champion Max Euwe and rising American stars Reuben Fine and Samuel Reshevsky, and 1 point ahead of ex-champion Alexander Alekhine. This was the first tournament victory by a Soviet master outside his own country. When the result reached Russia, Krylenko drafted a letter to be sent in Botvinnik's name to Stalin. On returning to Russia Botvinnik discovered he had been awarded the "Mark of Honour". Three weeks later, he began work on his dissertation for the Candidate's degree, obtaining this in June 1937, after his supervisor described the dissertation as "short and good", and the first work in its field. As a result of his efforts, he missed the 1937 Soviet championship, won by Grigory Levenfish, who was then nearly fifty. Later in 1937, Botvinnik drew a match of thirteen games against Grigory Levenfish. Accounts differ about how the match was arranged: Levenfish later wrote that Botvinnik challenged him; while Botvinnik wrote that Krylenko, angered by Botvinnik's absence from the tournament, ordered the match. Botvinnik won further Soviet Championship titles in 1939, 1944, 1945, and 1952, bringing his total to six - a record he shares with Mikhail Tal. In 1945 he dominated the tournament, scoring 15/17; however in 1952 he tied with Mark Taimanov and won the play-off match. ++2.C World title contender In 1938, the world's top eight players met in the Netherlands to compete in the AVRO tournament, whose winner was supposed to get a title match with the World Champion, Alexander Alekhine. Botvinnik placed third, behind Paul Keres and Reuben Fine. According to Botvinnik, Alekhine was most interested in playing an opponent who could raise the funds. After consulting the nearest available Soviet officials, Botvinnik discreetly challenged Alekhine, who promptly accepted, subject to conditions that would enable him to acclimatize in Russia and get some high-quality competitive practice a few months before the match. In Botvinnik's opinion, Alekhine was partly motivated by the desire for a reconciliation with the Soviet authorities, so that he could again visit his homeland. The match, including funding, was authorised at the highest Soviet political level in January 1939; however, a letter of confirmation was only sent two months later - in Botvinnik's opinion, because of opposition by his Soviet rivals, especially those who had become prominent before the Russian Revolution - and the outbreak of World War II prevented a World Championship match. In spring 1939, Botvinnik won the USSR Championship, and his book on the tournament described the approach to preparation which he had been developing since 1933. One striking feature of this was emphasis on opening preparation in order to gain a permanent positional advantage in the middle game, rather than seeking immediate tactical surprises that could only be used once. Botvinnik took an early lead in the 1940 USSR Championship, but faded badly in the later stages, eventually sharing fifth place. He attributed this to the unaccustomed difficulty of concentrating in a party-like atmosphere filled with noise and tobacco smoke. Botvinnik wrote to a friendly official, commenting that the champion was to be the winner of a match between Igor Bondarevsky and Andor Lilienthal, who had tied for first place, but had no achievements in international competition. The official's efforts led to a tournament for the title of "Absolute Champion of the USSR", whose official aim was to identify a Soviet challenger for Alekhine's title. The contestants were the top six finishers in the Soviet Championship - Bondarevsky, Lilienthal, Paul Keres (who had recently become a Soviet citizen), future World Champion Vasily Smyslov, Isaac Boleslavsky and Botvinnik - who were to play a quadruple round robin. Botvinnik's preparation with his second, Viacheslav Ragozin, included training matches in noisy, smoky rooms and he slept in the playing room, without opening the window. He won the tournament, 2½ points ahead of Keres and three ahead of Smyslov; moreover, with plus scores in the "mini-matches" against all his rivals. In June 1941 Nazi Germany invaded the Soviet Union. Botvinnik's wife Gayane, a ballerina, told him that her colleagues at the Kirov Opera and Ballet Theatre were being evacuated to the city of Perm,then known as Molotov in honour of Vyacheslav Molotov. The family found an apartment there, and Botvinnik obtained a job with the local electricity supply organization at the lowest pay rate and on condition that he did no research, as he had only a Candidate's degree. Botvinnik's only child, a daughter named Olya, was born in Perm in April 1942. In the evenings, Botvinnik wrote a book in which he annotated all the games of the "Absolute Championship of the USSR", in order to maintain his analytic skills in readiness for a match with Alekhine. His work included wood-cutting for fuel, which left him with insufficient energy for chess analysis. Botvinnik obtained from Molotov an order that he should be given three days off normal work in order to study chess. In 1943, after a two-year lay-off from competitive chess, Botvinnik won a tournament in Sverdlovsk, scoring 1½ out of 2 against each of his competitors - who included Smyslov, Vladimir Makogonov, Boleslavsky, and Ragozin. Chessbase regards this as one of the fifty strongest tournaments between 1851 and 1986. Shortly afterwards, Botvinnik was urged to return to Moscow by the People's Commissar for Power Stations, an admirer and subsequent good friend. On his return, Botvinnik suggested a match with Samuel Reshevsky in order to strengthen his claim for a title match with Alekhine, but this received no political support. In December 1943, he won the Moscow Championship, ahead of Smyslov. At the same time, opposition to his plan for a match with Alekhine re-surfaced, on the grounds that Alekhine was a political enemy and the only proper course was to demand that he be stripped of the title. The dispute ended in Botvinnik's favor, and in the dismissal of a senior chess official, one of those to have opposed Botvinnik's plan, who was also a KGB colonel. After Botvinnik won the 1944 and 1945 Soviet championships, most top Soviet players supported his desire for a World Championship match with Alekhine. However, the allegations that Alekhine had written anti-Semitic articles while in Nazi-occupied France made it difficult to host the match in the USSR. Botvinnik opened negotiations with the British Chess Federation to host the match in England, but these were cut short by Alekhine's death in 1946. When the Second World War ended, Botvinnik won the first high-level post-war tournament, at Groningen in 1946, with 14½ points from nineteen games, ½ point ahead of former World Champion Max Euwe and two ahead of Smyslov. He and Euwe both struggled in the last few rounds, and Botvinnik had a narrow escape against Euwe, who he acknowledged had always been a difficult opponent for him. This was Botvinnik's first outright victory in a tournament outside the Soviet Union. Botvinnik also won the very strong Mikhail Chigorin Memorial tournament held at Moscow 1947. ++2.D World Champion Botvinnik strongly influenced the design of the system which would be used for World Championship competition from 1948 to 1963. Viktor Baturinsky wrote "Now came Botvinnik's turn to defend his title in accordance with the new qualifying system which he himself had outlined in 1946" (this statement referred to Botvinnik's 1951 title defense). On the basis of his strong results during and just after World War II, Botvinnik was one of five players to contest the 1948 World Chess Championship, which was held at The Hague and Moscow. He won the 1948 tournament convincingly, with a score of 14/20, three points clear, becoming the sixth World Champion. While he was on vacation in Riga after the tournament, an eleven-year old boy called Mikhail Tal paid a visit, hoping to play a game against the new champion. Tal was met by Botvinnik's wife, who said the champion was asleep, and that she had made him take a rest from chess. Botvinnik then held the title, with two brief interruptions, for the next fifteen years, during which he played seven world championship matches. In 1951, he drew with David Bronstein over 24 games in Moscow, +5 -5 =14, keeping the world title, but it was a struggle for Botvinnik, who won the second-last game and drew the last in order to tie the match. In 1954, he drew with Vasily Smyslov over 24 games at Moscow, +7 -7 =10, again retaining the title. In 1957, he lost to Smyslov by 9-12½ in Moscow, but the rules then in force allowed him a rematch without having to go through the Candidates' Tournament, and in 1958 he won the rematch in Moscow; Smyslov said his health was poor during the return match. In 1960, Botvinnik was convincingly beaten 8½-12½ at Moscow by Tal, now 23 years old, but again exercised his right to a rematch in 1961, and won by 13-8 in Moscow. Commentators agreed that Tal's play was weaker in the rematch, probably due to his health, but also that Botvinnik's play was better than in the 1960 match, largely due to thorough preparation. Botvinnik changed his style in the rematch, avoiding the tactical complications in which Tal excelled and aiming for closed positions and endgames, where Tal's technique was not outstanding. Finally, in 1963, he lost the title to Tigran Petrosian, by 9-12 in Moscow. FIDE had by then altered the rules, and he was not allowed a rematch. The rematch rule had been nicknamed the "Botvinnik rule", because he twice benefited from it. Though ranking as formal World Champion, Botvinnik had a relatively poor playing record in the early 1950s: he played no formal competitive games after winning the 1948 match tournament until he defended his title, then struggled to draw his 1951 championship match with Bronstein, placed only fifth in the 1951 Soviet Championship, and tied for third in the 1952 Géza Maróczy Memorial tournament in Budapest; and he had also performed poorly in Soviet training contests. Botvinnik did not play in the Soviet team that won the 1952 Chess Olympiad in Helsinki: the players voted for the line-up and placed Botvinnik on second board, with Keres on top board; Botvinnik protested and refused to play. Keres' playing record from 1950 to early 1952 had been outstanding. Botvinnik won the 1952 Soviet Championship (joint first with Mark Taimanov in the tournament, won the play-off match). He included several wins from that tournament over the 1952 Soviet team members in his book Botvinnik's Best Games 1947-1970, writing "these games had a definite significance for me". In 1956, he tied for first place with Smyslov in the 1956 Alexander Alekhine Memorial in Moscow, despite a last-round loss to Keres. ++2.E Team tournaments Botvinnik was selected for the Soviet Olympiad team from 1954 to 1964 inclusively, and helped his team to gold medal finishes each of those six times. At Amsterdam 1954 he was on board one and won the gold medal with 8?/11. Then at home for Moscow 1956, he was again board one, and scored 9?/13 for the bronze medal. For Munich 1958, he scored 9/12 for the silver medal on board one. At Leipzig 1960, he played board two behind Mikhail Tal, having lost his title to Tal earlier that year; But he won the board two gold medal with 10?/13. He was back on board one for Varna 1962, scored 8/12, but failed to win a medal for the only time at an Olympiad. His final Olympiad was Tel Aviv 1964, where he won the bronze with 9/12, playing board 2 as he had lost his title to Petrosian. Overall, in six Olympiads, he scored 54½/73 for an outstanding 74.6 percent. Botvinnik also played twice for the USSR in the European Team Championship. At Oberhausen 1961, he scored 6/9 for the gold medal on board one. But at Hamburg 1965, he struggled on board two with only 3½/8. Both times the Soviet Union won the team gold medals. Botvinnik played one of the final events of his career at the Russia (USSR) vs Rest of the World match in Belgrade 1970, scoring 2½/4 against Milan Matulovic, as the USSR narrowly triumphed. ++2.F Late career After losing the world title for the final time, to Tigran Petrosian in Moscow in 1963, Botvinnik withdrew from the following World Championship cycle after FIDE declined, at its annual congress in 1965, to grant a losing champion the automatic right to a rematch. He remained involved with competitive chess, appearing in several highly-rated tournaments and continuing to produce memorable games. He retired from competitive play in 1970, aged 59, preferring instead to occupy himself with the development of computer chess programs and to assist with the training of younger Soviet players, earning him the nickname of "Patriarch of the Soviet Chess School" (see below). Botvinnik's autobiography, K Dostizheniyu Tseli, was published in Russian in 1978, and in English translation as Achieving the Aim (ISBN 0-08-024120-4) in 1981. A staunch Communist, he was noticeably shaken by the collapse of the Soviet Union and lost some of his standing in Russian chess during the Boris Yeltsin era. In the 1980s Botvinnik proposed a computer program to manage the Soviet economy, however his proposals did not receive significant attention from the Soviet government. During the last few years of his life he personally financed his economic computer project that he hoped would be used to manage the Russian economy.He kept actively working on the program until his death and financing the work from the money he made for the lectures and seminars he attended, despite prominent health problems. Botvinnik died of pancreatic cancer in 1995. According to his daughter, Botvinnik remained active until the last few months of his life, and continued to go to work until March, 1995 despite blindness in one of his eyes (and extremely poor vision in the other). ++2.G Political controversies The Soviet Union regarded chess as a symbol of Communist superiority, and hence the Soviet chess world was extremely politicized. As Botvinnik was the first world-class player produced by the Soviet Union, everything he said or did (or did not say or do) had political repercussions, and there were rumors that Soviet opponents were given hints that they should not beat him. David Bronstein wrote that Boris Verlinsky had won the 1929 Soviet Championship and was granted the first Soviet Grandmaster title for this achievement, yet he was later stripped of it, when it was thought more politically correct to make Botvinnik the first official Soviet GM (as distinct from the-then nonexistent FIDE grandmaster title). Botvinnik wrote that before the last round of the 1935 Moscow tournament Soviet Commissar of Justice Nikolai Krylenko, who was also in charge of Soviet chess, proposed that Ilya Rabinovich should deliberately lose to Botvinnik, to ensure that Botvinnik took first place. Botvinnik refused, saying "... then I will myself put a piece en prise and resign". The game was drawn, and Botvinnik shared first place with Salo Flohr. Botvinnik sent an effusive telegram of thanks to Joseph Stalin after his victory at the great tournament in Nottingham in 1936. Many years later he said that it had been written in Moscow and that KGB agents told him to sign it. Botvinnik played relatively poorly in the very strong 1940 Soviet Championship, finishing in a tie for fifth/sixth places, with 11½/19, two full points behind Igor Bondarevsky and Andor Lilienthal. With World War II under way by this time, and the strong possibility of little or no chess for some time in the future, Botvinnik seems to have prevailed upon the Soviet chess leadership to hold another tournament "in order to clarify the situation". This wound up being the 1941 Absolute Championship of the USSR, which featured the top six finishers from the 1940 event, playing each other four times. After a personal appeal to the defence minister, Vyacheslav Molotov, Botvinnik was exempted from war work for three days a week in order to concentrate on chess preparations. He won this tournament convincingly, and thus reclaimed his position as the USSR's top player. Bronstein claimed that at the end of the 1946 Groningen tournament, a few months after the death of reigning world champion Alexander Alekhine, Botvinnik personally invited Samuel Reshevsky, Reuben Fine, Max Euwe, Vasily Smyslov, and Paul Keres to join him in a tournament to decide the new world champion, but other evidence suggests that FIDE (the "governing body" of chess), had already proposed a World Championship tournament before the Groningen tournament began, and at this stage the Soviet Union was not a member and therefore took no part in framing that proposal. Since Keres lost his first four games against Botvinnik in the 1948 World Championship tournament, winning only in the final cycle after the outcome of the tournament had been decided, suspicions have sometimes been raised that Keres was forced to "throw" games to allow Botvinnik to win the Championship. Chess historian Taylor Kingston investigated all the available evidence and arguments, and concluded that: Soviet chess officials gave Keres strong hints that he should not hinder Botvinnik's attempt to win the World Championship; Botvinnik only discovered this about half-way through the tournament and protested so strongly that he angered Soviet officials; Keres probably did not deliberately lose games to Botvinnik or anyone else in the tournament. Bronstein insinuated that Soviet officials pressured him to lose in the 1951 world championship match so that Botvinnik would keep the title, but comments by Botvinnik's second, Salo Flohr, and Botvinnik's own annotations to the critical 23rd game indicate that Botvinnik knew of no such plot. In 1956, FIDE changed the world championship rules so that a defeated champion would have the right to a return match. Yuri Averbakh alleged that this was done at the urging of the two Soviet representatives in FIDE, who were personal friends of Botvinnik. Averbakh also claims that Botvinnik's friends were behind FIDE's decision in 1956 to limit the number of players from the same country that could compete in the Candidates Tournament, and that this was to Botvinnik's advantage as it reduced the number of Soviet players he might have to meet in the title match. Botvinnik asked to be allowed to play in the 1956 Candidates Tournament, as he wanted to use the event as part of his warm-up for the next year's title match, but his request was refused. Mikhail Tal's chronic kidney problems contributed to his defeat in his 1961 return match with Botvinnik, and his doctors in Riga advised that he should postpone the match for health reasons. Averbakh claimed that Botvinnik would agree to a postponement only if Tal was certified unfit by Moscow doctors, and that Tal then decided to play. While there is no doubt that Botvinnik sincerely believed in Communism, he by no means submissively followed the party line. In 1954, he wrote an article about inciting socialist revolution in western countries, aiming to spread Communism without a third world war. And in 1960 Botvinnik wrote a letter to the Soviet Government proposing economic reforms that were contrary to party policy. In 1976 Soviet grandmasters were asked to sign a letter condemning Viktor Korchnoi as a "traitor" after Korchnoi defected. Botvinnik evaded this "request" by saying that he wanted to write his own letter denouncing Korchnoi. By this time, however, his importance had waned and officials would not give him this "privilege", so Botvinnik's name did not appear on the group letter - an outcome Botvinnik may have foreseen. Bronstein and Boris Spassky openly refused to sign the letter. ++2.H Assessment ++2.H1 Playing strength and style For more information see Comparing top chess players throughout history Reuben Fine observed that Botvinnik was at or near the top of the chess world for thirty years - from 1933, when he drew a match against Flohr, to 1963, when he lost the world championship for the final time, to Petrosian - "a feat equaled historically only by Emanuel Lasker and Steinitz". The statistical rating system used in Raymond Keene and Nathan Divinsky's book Warriors of the Mind concludes that Botvinnik was the fourth strongest player of all time: behind Garry Kasparov, Anatoly Karpov and Bobby Fischer but ahead of José Raúl Capablanca, Lasker, Viktor Korchnoi, Boris Spassky, Vasily Smyslov and Tigran Petrosian. The Chessmetrics system is sensitive to the length of the periods being compared, but places Botvinnik third in a comparison of players' best individual years (1946 for Botvinnik) and sixth in a comparison of fifteen-year periods (1935-1949 in Botvinnik's case). In 2005 Chessmetrics' creator Jeff Sonas wrote an article which examined various ways of comparing the strength of "world number one" players, some not based on Chessmetrics; and Botvinnik generally emerged as one of the top six (the greatest exceptions were in criteria related to tournament results). FIDE did not adopt the Elo rating system until 1970, by which time Botvinnik's strength had been declining for several years. According to unofficial calculations by Árpád Elo, Botvinnik was the highest-rated player from 1937 to 1954, peaking about 2730 in 1946. This may seem surprising in the light of Botvinnik's results in the 1950s and early 1960s, when he failed to win a world championship match outright (as reigning champion) and his tournament results were patchy. But after the FIDE world championship cycle was established in 1948, reigning champions had to play the strongest contender every three years, and successful title defenses became less common than in the pre-World War II years, when the titleholder could select his challenger. Despite this, Botvinnik held the world title for a longer period than any of his successors except Garry Kasparov. Botvinnik also became world champion at the relatively late age of 37, because World War II brought international competition to a virtual halt for six years; and he was 52 years old when he finally lost his title (only Wilhelm Steinitz and Emanuel Lasker were older when they were defeated). Botvinnik's best years were from 1935 to 1946; during that period he dominated Soviet chess; and the USSR's 15-4½ win in the 1945 radio match against the USA proved that the USSR's top players were considerably better than the USA's (who had dominated international team competitions in the 1930s). Botvinnik generally sought tense positions with chances for both sides; hence his results were often better with the Black pieces as he could avoid lines that were likely to produce draws. He had a strong grasp of long-term strategy, and was often willing to accept weaknesses that his opponent could not exploit in exchange for some advantage that Botvinnik could exploit. He confessed that he was relatively weak in tactical calculation, yet many of his games feature sacrifices - often long-term positional sacrifices whose purpose was not to force a quick win, but to improve his position and undermine his opponent's. Botvinnik was also capable of all-out sacrificial attacks when he thought the position justified it. Botvinnik saw himself as a "universal player" (all-rounder), in contrast to all-out tactical calculators like Mikhail Tal or purely positional players like Tigran Petrosian. Reuben Fine considered Botvinnik's collection of best games one of the three most beautiful up to the mid-1950s (the other two were Alexander Alekhine's and Akiba Rubinstein's). Kasparov quotes Tigran Petrosian as saying, "There was a very unpleasant feeling of inevitability. Once in a conversation with Keres I mentioned this and even compared Botvinnik with a bulldozer, which sweeps away everything in its path. Keres smiled and said: 'But can you imagine what it was like to play him when he was young?'" ++2.H2 Influence on the game Botvinnik's example and teaching established the modern approach to preparing for competitive chess: regular but moderate physical exercise; analysing very thoroughly a relatively narrow repertoire of openings; annotating one's own games, those of past great players and those of competitors; publishing one's annotations so that others can point out any errors; studying strong opponents to discover their strengths and weaknesses; ruthless objectivity about one's own strengths and weaknesses. Botvinnik also played many short training matches against strong grandmasters including Salo Flohr, Yuri Averbakh, Viacheslav Ragozin, and Semion Furman - in noisy or smoky rooms if he thought he would have to face such conditions in actual competition. Vladimir Kramnik said, "Botvinnik's chess career was the way of a genius, although he was not a genius", meaning that Botvinnik was brilliant at making the best use of his talents. Although Botvinnik did not use a wide range of openings, he made major contributions to those he did use, for example: the Botvinnik variation of the Semi-Slav Defense in the Queen's Gambit Declined, the Kasparov/Botvinnik system in the Exchange Variation of the Queen's Gambit Declined, the Caro-Kann Defence (both the Panov- Botvinnik Attack for White and various approaches for Black), the Winawer Variation of the French Defence, the Botvinnik System in the English Opening. In his openings research Botvinnik did not aim to produce tactical tricks that would only be effective once but rather systems in which he aimed to understand typical positions and their possibilities better than his rivals. His advice to his pupils included "My theory of the openings fitted into one notebook" and "You don't have to know that which everyone knows, but it is important to know that which not everyone knows." In fact he used different notebooks in different periods, and copied a few analyses from one notebook to the next. The "Soviet School of Chess" that dominated competition from 1945 to about 2000 followed Botvinnik's approach to preparation and to openings research; and, although Soviet players had their own preferred styles of play, they adopted his combative approach and willingness to ignore "classical" principles if doing so offered credible prospects of a lasting advantage. In 1963 Botvinnik founded his own school within the Soviet coaching system, and its graduates include world champions Anatoly Karpov, Garry Kasparov and Vladimir Kramnik, and other top-class players such as Alexei Shirov, Vladimir Akopian and Jaan Ehlvest. Botvinnik was not an infallible spotter of chess talent: although he said of the 11-year old Kasparov, "The future of chess lies in the hands of this young man", he said on first seeing Karpov, "The boy doesn't have a clue about chess, and there's no future at all for him in this profession." But Karpov recounts fondly his youthful memories of the Botvinnik school and credits Botvinnik's training, especially the homework he assigned, with a marked improvement in his own play. Kasparov presents Botvinnik almost as a kind of father figure, going some way towards balancing the common public perception of Botvinnik as dour and aloof; and Kasparov inherited Botvinnik's emphasis on preparation, research and innovation. Botvinnik was still playing a major teaching role in his late 70s, when Kramnik entered the school, and made a favorable impression on his pupil. ++2.I Other achievements ++2.I1 Electrical engineer ingEngineering was as much of a passion for Botvinnik as chess - at Nottingham in 1936, where he had his first major tournament win outside the USSR, he said "I wish I could do what he's done in electrical engineering" (referring to Milan Vidmar, another grandmaster). He was awarded the Order of the Badge of Honour for his work on power stations in the Urals during World War II (while he was also establishing himself as the world's strongest chess player). He earned his doctorate in electrical engineering in 1951.] In 1956, he joined the Research Institute for Electrical Energy as a senior research scientist. ++2.I2 Computer chess In the 1950s Botvinnik became interested in computers, at first mainly for playing chess but he later also co-authored reports on the possible use of artificial intelligence in managing the Soviet economy. Botvinnik's research on chess-playing programs concentrated on "selective searches", which used general chess principles to decide which moves were worth considering. This was the only feasible approach for the primitive computers available in the Soviet Union in the early 1960s, which were only capable of searching three or four half-moves deep (i.e. A's move, B's move, A's move, B's move) if they tried to examine every variation. Botvinnik eventually developed an algorithm that was reasonably good at finding the right move in difficult positions, but it often missed the right move in simple positions, e.g. where it was possible to checkmate in two moves. This "selective" approach turned out to be a dead end, as computers were powerful enough by the mid-1970s to perform a brute-force search (checking all possible moves) several moves deep and today's vastly more powerful computers do this well enough to compete against human world champions. However, his PIONEER program contained a generalized method of decision-making that, with a few adjustments, enabled it to plan maintenance of power stations all over the USSR. On September 7, 1991 Botvinnik was awarded an honorary degree in mathematics of the University of Ferrara (Italy) for his work on computer chess. ++2.J Writings ++2.J1 Chess * Botvinnik, M.M. (1960). One hundred selected games. Courier Dover. ISBN 0486206203. * Botvinnik, M.M. (1972). Cafferty, B.. ed. Botvinnik's best games, 1947-1970. Batsford. ISBN 0713403578. * Botvinnik, M.M. (1973). Garry, S.. ed. Soviet chess championship, 1941: Complete text of games with detailed notes & an introduction. Dover Publications. ISBN 0486221849. * Botvinnik, M.M. (1973). World Championship: The Return Match Botvinnik vs. Smyslov 1958. Chess Digest Magazine. * Botvinnik, M.M. (1973). Alekhine vs. Euwe return match 1937. Chess Digest. * Matanovic, A.; Kazic, B., Yudovich, M., and Botvinnik, M.M. (1974). Candidates' matches 1974. Centar Za Unapredivanje Saha. * Botvinnik, M.M. (1978). Anatoly Karpov: His Road to the World Championship. Elsevier. ISBN 0080211399. * Botvinnik, M.M.; Estrin, Y. (1980). The Gruenfeld Defense. Rhm Pr. ISBN 0890580170. * Botvinnik, M.M. (1981). Cafferty, B.. ed. Achieving the Aim. Pergamon Press. ISBN 0080241204. * Botvinnik, M.M. (1981). Selected Games: 1967-1970. Pergamon. ISBN 0080241239. * Botvinnik, M.M. (1982). Marfia, J.. ed. Fifteen Games and Their Stories. Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, U.S.A: Chess Enterprises. ISBN 0931462150. * Botvinnik, M.M. (1985). Botvinnik on the Endgame. Chess Enterprises. ISBN 0931462436. * Botvinnik, M.M. (1996). Neat, K. and Stauss, E.. ed. Half a Century of Chess. Cadogan Books. ISBN 1857441222. * Botvinnik, M.M. (2000). Neat, K.. ed. Botvinnik's Best Games Volume 1: 1925-1941. Moravian Chess. ISBN 807189317. * Botvinnik, M.M. (2000). Neat, K.. ed. Botvinnik's Best Games Volume 2: 1942-1956. Moravian Chess. ISBN 8071893706. * Botvinnik, M.M. (2000). Neat, K.. ed. Botvinnik's Best Games Volume 3: 1957-1970 - Analytical & Critical Works. Moravian Chess. ISBN 8071894052. * Botvinnik, M.M. (2002). Championship Chess: Match Tournament for the Absolute Chess Championship of the USSR, Leningrad- Moscow 1941. Hardinge Simpole. ISBN 9781843820123. * Botvinnik, M.M. (2004). Match for the World Chess Championship Mikhail Botvinnik-David Bronstein Moscow 1951. Edition Olms. ISBN 3283004595. * Botvinnik, M.M. (2004). Botvinnik, I.. ed. World Championship Return Match: Botvinnik V. Tal, Moscow 1961. Olms. ISBN 9783283004613. ++2.J2 Computers * Botvinnik, M.M. (1970). Computers, Chess and Long-Range Planning. Springer Verlag. ISBN 0387900128. * Botvinnik, M.M. (1984). Computers in Chess: Solving Inexact Search Problems. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0387908692. ++2.K Notable chess games * Botvinnik vs Chekhover, Moscow 1935, Reti Opening, 1-0 * Botvinnik vs Capablanca, AVRO 1938, Nimzo-Indian Defense, 1-0 At first sight Botvinnik's opening play looks unpromising, but he knew how his attack would develop. * Keres vs Botvinnik, USSR Absolute Championship 1941, Nimzo- Indian Defense, 0-1 Playing as Black, Botvinnik demolishes a world title contender in 22 moves. * Tolush vs Botvinnik, USSR Championship 1944, 0-1 Long-term positional sacrifices. * Denker vs Botvinnik, USA vs USSR radio match 1945, 0-1 Botvinnik uses the Botvinnik System in the Semi-Slav Defense to bulldoze US champion Arnold Denker. * Botvinnik vs Keres, Alekhine Memorial Tournament Moscow 1966, 1-0 Botvinnik shows his superior understanding of closed positions, and when to open them. * Botvinnik vs Portisch, Monaco 1968, 1-0 A fireworks display starting with an exchange sacrifice on the c-file, a tactic on which Botvinnik wrote the book. ++2.L Tournament results 1923 Leningrad 8 School championship - - - Botvinnik estimates "about 10th out of 16". 1924 Leningrad - School championship 1st 5/6 +5 -1 =0 1924 Leningrad - non-category 1st 11/13 +11 -1 =1 1924 Leningrad - 2nd and 3rd Categories 1st 11/13 +11 -1 =1 1924 Leningrad - 2A Category - - - Tournament unfinished 1925 Leningrad - 2A and 1B Categories 1st 10/11 +10 -1 =0 1925 Leningrad - 1st Category 3rd 7/11 +7 -3 =1 1925 Leningrad - 1st Category - - - Tournament unfinished 1926 Leningrad - Leningrad Championship, Semi-finals 1st 11½ / 12 +11 -0 =1 1926 Leningrad - Leningrad Championship 2nd= 7/9 +6 -1 =2 1926 Leningrad - Northwest Provincial Championship, Semi-finals tied 2nd 9/11 +8 -1 =2 1926 Leningrad - Northwest Provincial Championship 3rd 6/10 +4 -1 =5 1927 Leningrad - Tournament of "Six" 2nd 7/10 +6 -1 =3 1927 Moscow - 5th USSR Chess Championship tied 5th 12/20 +9 -4 =7 1928 Leningrad - Regional Metalworkers' Committee Championship 1st 8/11 +7 -1 =3 1929 Leningrad - Regional Committee of Educational Workers' Championship 1st 11/14 +9 -0 =5 1929 Odessa - 6th USSR Chess Championship, Quarter-finals 1st 7/8 +6 -0 =2 1929 Odessa - 6th USSR Chess Championship, Semi-finals tied 3rd 2/5 +2 -2 =1 1930 Leningrad - Masters' Tournament 1st 6/8 +6 -1 =1 1931 Leningrad - Leningrad Championship 1st 14/17 +12 -1 =4 1931 Moscow - 7th USSR Chess Championship, Semi-finals 2nd 6/9 +6 -2 =1 1931 Moscow - 7th USSR Chess Championship 1st 13/17 +12 -2 =3 1932 Leningrad - Leningrad Championship 1st 10/11 +9 -0 =2 1932 Leningrad - Masters' Tournament in House of Scientists 1st 7/10 +6 -2 =2 1933 Leningrad - Masters' Tournament Tied 1st 10/13 +7 -0 =6 1933 Leningrad - 8th USSR Chess Championship 1st 14/19 +11 -2 =6 1934 Leningrad - Tournament including Euwe and Kmoch 1st 7/11 +5 -1 =5 1934 Hastings - Hastings International Chess Congress tied 5th 5/9 +3 -2 =4 1935 Moscow - 2nd International Tournament tied 1st 13/19 +9 -2 =8 1936 Moscow - 3rd International Tournament 2nd 12/18 +7 -1 =10 1936 Nottingham - International Tournament tied 1st 10/14 +6 -0 =8 1938 Leningrad - 11th USSR Chess Championship, Semi-finals 1st 14/17 +12 -1 =4 1938 Amsterdam, etc. - AVRO tournament 3rd 7/14 +3 -2 =9 1939 Leningrad - 11th USSR Chess Championship 1st 12/17 +8 -0 =9 1940 Moscow - 12th USSR Chess Championship tied 5th 11/19 +8 -4 =7 1941 Leningrad, Moscow - Absolute Chess Championship of the USSR 1st 13/20 +9 -2 =9 1943 Sverdlovsk - Masters' Tournament 1st 10/14 +7 -0 =7 1943 Moscow - Moscow Championship 1st 13/16 +12 -1 =3 1944 Moscow - 13th USSR Chess Championship 1st 12/16 +11 -2 =3 1945 Moscow - 14th USSR Chess Championship 1st 15/17 +13 -0 =4 1946 Groningen - International Tournament 1st 14/19 +13 -3 =3 1947 Moscow - Chigorin Memorial Tournament 1st 11/15 +8 -1 =6 1948 The Hague, Moscow - World Chess Championship Tournament 1st 14/20 +10 -2 =8 1951 Moscow - 19th USSR Chess Championship 5th 10/17 +6 -3 =8 1952 Budapest - Maroczy Jubilee tied 3rd 11/17 +7 -2 =8 1952 Moscow - 20th USSR Chess Championship tied 1st 13/19 +9 -1 =9 Defeated Taimanov in a play-off for first place. 1955 Moscow - 22nd USSR Chess Championship tied 3rd 11/19 +7 -3 =9 1956 Moscow - Alekhine Memorial tied 1st 11/15 +8 -1 =6 1958 Wageningen - International Tournament 1st 4/5 +3 -0 =2 1961-1962 Hastings - International Chess Congress (Premier) 1st 8/9 +7 -0 =2 1962 Stockholm - International Tournament 1st 8/9 +8 -0 =1 1965 Noordwijk - International Tournament 1st 6/7 +5 -0 =2 1966 Amsterdam - IBM Tournament 1st 7/9 +7 -1 =1 1966-1967 Hastings - International Chess Congress (Premier) 1st 6/9 +5 -1 =3 1967 Palma de Mallorca - International Tournament tied 2nd 12/17 +9 -1 =7 1968 Monte Carlo - International Tournament 2nd 9/13 +5 -0 =8 1969 Wijk aan Zee - Hoogovens (Grandmaster Section) tied 1st 10/15 +6 -0 =9 1969 Belgrade - International Tournament 7th 8/15 +5 -3 =7 1970 Leiden - Quadrangular Tournament tied 3rd 5/12 +1 -2 =9 Four players. Each opponent was played four times. ++2.L1 Match results 1933 Salo Flohr Tied Moscow, Leningrad 6 /12 +2 =8 -2 Challenge 1937 Grigory Levenfish Tied Moscow, Leningrad 6.5/13 +5 =3 -5 Challenge 1940 Viacheslav Ragozin Won Moscow, Leningrad 8/12 +5 =7 -0 Training 1951 David Bronstein Tied Moscow 12/24 +5 =14 -5 World title 1952 Mark Taimanov Won Moscow 3.5/6 +1 =5 -0 USSR Ch playoff 1954 Vasily Smyslov Tied Moscow 12/24 +7 =10 -7 World title 1957 Vasily Smyslov Lost Moscow 9/22 +3 =13 -6 World title 1958 Vasily Smyslov Won Moscow 12/23 +7 =11 -5 Rematch 1960 Mikhail Tal Lost Moscow 8/21 +2 =13 -6 World title 1961 Mikhail Tal Won Moscow 13/21 +10 =6 -5 Rematch 1963 Tigran Petrosian Lost Moscow 9/21 +2 =14 -5 World title ++3. Reuben Fine - Mikhail Botvinnik, Amsterdam 1938 AVRO Tournament, Amsterdam 1938, Round 1 White: Reuben Fine Black: Mikhail Botvinnik Result: 1-0 ECO: C17 - French Defense, Paulsen Variation, Winawer Variation, Advance Variation Notes by R.J. Macdonald 1. e4 e6 (The French Defense.) 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 (The Paulsen Variation.) 3. ... Bb4 (The Winawer Variation.) 4. e5 (The Advance Variation.) 4. ... c5 5. dxc5 (5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. Nf3 Nbc6 8. Be2 0-0 9. 0-0 Qa5 10. Bd2 Bd7 11. Rb1 b6 leaves white with a slight advantage.) 5. ... Ne7 6. Nf3 Nbc6 (6. ... Nd7 7. Bd3 Nxc5 8. 0-0 Bd7 9. Be3 Nxd3 10. cxd3 Nf5 11. Qb3 Nxe3 offers equal chances.) 7. Bd3 d4 8. a3 Ba5 9. b4 Nxb4 10. axb4 Bxb4 (Black pins: Bb4xc3.) 11. Bb5+ (11. 0-0 Bxc3 12. Rb1 h6 (12. ... Qc7 13. Ng5 Qxe5 14. Qf3 Qf6 15. Bb5+ Kf8 16. Qe2 Nd5 17. f4 d3 18. Qxd3 Qd4+ 19. Kh1 Qxd3 20. Bxd3 a5 21. Ne4 Bb4 22. c4 Ne7 23. Rd1 Bd7 24. Bd2 Ba4 25. Bxb4 Bxd1 26. Ba3 Ba4 27. Rxb7 0-1 in 74 moves, as in the game A. Bisguier (2440) - C. Blocker, Fairfax 1976) 13. Nd2 (13. Bb2 Bxb2 14. Rxb2 0-0 15. Be4 Qc7 16. Qxd4 Rd8 17. Qc4 Rb8 18. Bd3 Bd7 19. Re1 Bc6 20. Qf4 Qa5 21. Qe3 Rd5 22. h4 Qxc5 23. Qf4 Ng6 24. Bxg6 fxg6 25. Qg4 Kh7 26. h5 gxh5 27. Qxe6 Rf8 1/2-1/2 in 34 moves, as in the game R. Zelcic (2578) - S. Martinovic (2362), Zadar 2007) 13. ... Bxd2 14. Bxd2 g6 15. Qf3 Nc6 16. Rfe1 Qe7 17. h3 a5 18. Bb5 Bd7 19. Ba4 Ra7 20. Rb6 Qxc5 21. Reb1 Nd8 22. Qf6 Rg8 23. Rd6 b5 24. Rxb5 Qc8 25. Rxa5 Rb7 1-0, as in the game R. Zelcic (2557) - T. Petrusic (2065), Bosnjaci 2010.) 11. ... Nc6 (11. ... Bd7 12. Qxd4 Bxc3+ 13. Qxc3 Bxb5 14. Nd4 offers equal chances.) 12. Bxc6+ (This gives white a slight advantage.) 12. ... bxc6 (Black has a cramped position.) 13. Ra4 Bxc3+ 14. Bd2 f6 (This covers g5. 14. ... a5 15. 0-0 Ba6 16. Bxc3 dxc3 (16. ... Bxf1?? is no good because of 17. Rxd4 Qe7 18. Qxf1, with a decisive advantage for white) 17. Qxd8+ Rxd8 with equality.) 15. 0-0 (15. Bxc3 dxc3 16. Qa1 Qe7 17. Qxc3 Rb8 gives white a solid advantage.) 15. ... 0-0 16. Bxc3 dxc3 17. Qe1 a5 (17. ... fxe5 18. Qxe5 Qf6 19. Qe3 is strong for white.) 18. Qxc3 Ba6 Key Move Diagram: r2q1rk1/ 6pp/ b1p1pp2/ p1P1P3/ R7/ 2Q2N2/ 2P2PPP/ 5RK1 Position after black's 18th move. 19. Rfa1 (19. Re1 Bb5 20. Rd4 Qe7 is very strong for white.) 19. ... Bb5 (19. ... Be2 20. Nd4 Bb5 21. Nxe6 is strong for white. 21. Rxa5?? would be a mistake: that pawn is poisoned: 21. ... Rxa5 22. Re1 Re8 23. exf6 Ra4 24. Nxb5 cxb5 is very strong for black. 21. Nxb5?! cxb5 22. Rxa5 Rxa5 23. Qxa5 Qd4 gives white a slight advantage.) 20. Rd4 (20. Re4 a4 is solid for white.) 20. ... Qe7 21. Rd6 (21. Qe3 Rad8 (21. ... Qxc5?? may look tempting but Black must resist capturing the pawn: 22. exf6 Qf5 23. Rf4 is decisive for white) 22. Rd6 a4 gives white a very strong advantage.) 21. ... a4 (21. ... fxe5 22. Nxe5 Rf5 23. Qe1 with a very strong advantage for white. 23. Nxc6?! Bxc6 24. Rxc6 Qd7 gives white only a slight edge.) 22. Qe3 (White now has a decisive advantage.) 22. ... Ra7 (22. ... h6 23. h3 is still very strong for white.) 23. Nd2 a3 (23. ... Ra5 24. c4 Ba6 is decisive for white.) 24. c4 Ba4 25. exf6 Qxf6 26. Rxa3 Re8 (26. ... Qf5 27. Qxe6+ Qxe6 28. Rxe6 is decisive for white.) 27. h3 Raa8 (27. ... Qf7 28. Ne4 Bc2 29. Rxa7 Qxa7 30. Ng5 is very strong for white. 30. Rxc6 is no comparison: 30. ... Qb7 31. Nf6+ gxf6 32. Rxe6 Qb1+ 33. Kh2 Qb8+ 34. Kg1 Kf7 35. Rxe8 Qxe8 gives black a slight advantage.) 28. Nf3 Qb2 (28. ... h6 hardly improves anything after 29. Nd4, where white should win easily.) 29. Ne5 Qb1+ (29. ... Rf8 cannot undo what has already been done: 30. Rxe6 h6 31. Nd7 should win easily for white.) 30. Kh2 Qf5 (30. ... Bc2 doesn't get the bull off the ice: 31. Rxa8 Rxa8 32. Nxc6 with a decisive advantage for white.) 31. Qg3 (Black resigned in view of 31. ... Bc2 32. Rd7 and white has an easy win.) 1-0