[bksvol-discuss] scanning books already in the collection
- From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:36:43 -0400
I believe someone is going to re-submit a re-scan of it, being under the
impression that it was rife with errors. I remember Cindy aid I posting
messages on this subject last week.
At 08:18 AM 8/31/2005, you wrote:
Someone was asking what was wrong with A Cultured Handmaiden. The answer is
nothing. Someone just sat on it for 8 months, faithfully renewing every
week, until she missed one and her time expired, at which point I snagged it
aon a Friday and uploaded it on the following Tuesday with headers fixed and
spelling checked. There really was very little that needed doing. There was
no reason for it to sit on step 1 for a year. It was the thing Mike
complains about, long-term renewing.
Tracy
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [bksvol-discuss] A Cultured Handmaiden approved
- From: Tracy Carcione
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] scanning books already in the collection
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanning books already in the collection
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanning books already in the collection
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanning books already in the collection
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanning books already in the collection
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanning books already in the collection
Someone was asking what was wrong with A Cultured Handmaiden. The answer is nothing. Someone just sat on it for 8 months, faithfully renewing every week, until she missed one and her time expired, at which point I snagged it aon a Friday and uploaded it on the following Tuesday with headers fixed and spelling checked. There really was very little that needed doing. There was no reason for it to sit on step 1 for a year. It was the thing Mike complains about, long-term renewing. Tracy
- [bksvol-discuss] A Cultured Handmaiden approved
- From: Tracy Carcione