[bksvol-discuss] book bumped back to step one

Hi, Lori.

A book is usually bumped back to Step One by the
administrator if the copyright is missing or the
authors aren't listed correctly, or something
technical like that. It isn't really a rejection.It
will usually say in the comments and is something
minor to be fixed. Hopefully, now, I think it has been
said, that it's the validated copy and not the
original that's bumped back. I'll copy this to Claire
and get that confirmed. One of our complaints was that
it seemed a waste of time to have to revalidate a
whole book if the problem was only something like that
that could easily be fixed, and I thought that change
was instituted. smile

Cindy

--- Lori Castner <loralee.castner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hi, I'm confused here.  If a book is rejected, why
> and when does it go back 
> to the Step One page?
> 
> If it goes back to the step one page won't it be
> downloaded by a different 
> validator who will find the same reason for
> rejecting it?  I thought all 
> rejected books just went into the rejected cue.
> 
> Cat Lover Lori
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bob" <rwiley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:45 AM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: rejecting a book
> 
> 
> >I totally agree.
> >
> > I discovered that one of my books had been
> rejected only by finding it on 
> > the download page again. When I looked at the
> comments, I knew exactly 
> > what had gone wrong. But I found that to be a more
> humiliating way of 
> > discovering my mistakes, and would much prefer a
> letter telling me what 
> > happened to the book.
> >
> > Bob
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:36 AM
> > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: rejecting a book
> >
> >
> >> Bob I do know that the books I reject tend to be
> from people who make the 
> >> same kinds of misstakes over and over again. If
> my comments are not 
> >> forwarded to them, I have no idea how they will
> learn to submit 
> >> acceptable scans in future.
> >>
> >> I doubt folks are so thin skinned that they
> prefer no reason at all for a 
> >> reject to a plausible well written explanation
> for the reject. Apparently 
> >> staff for now has decided otherwise. I had no
> idea this was going on by 
> >> the way. What a shame!
> >>
> >> E.
> >>
> >>
> >> At 06:20 AM 10/30/2007, you wrote:
> >>>It would be helpful to validators if an email was
> sent to the validator 
> >>>who uploaded a rejected book stating that a book
> was rejected, and giving 
> >>>the reasons for that rejection.
> >>>
> >>>Currently I don't think validators are notified
> when a book they have 
> >>>uploaded is rejected. Therefore, a validator may
> think he/she is doing a 
> >>>fine job when, in reality, they are making the
> same mistake over and 
> >>>over.
> >>>
> >>>Bob
> >>>----- Original Message ----- From: "E."
> <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:49 AM
> >>>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] rejecting a book
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I am extremely careful to only reject a book for
> truly overwhelming 
> >>>>reasons. I have rescued many submits since
> beginning to volunteer for 
> >>>>bookshare in 2002. Please know I give extensive
> explanations to Claire. 
> >>>>Please do find out the reason when your book is
> rejected. I give 
> >>>>extensive explanations so folks can learn to do
> better work. Submitters 
> >>>>and validators all work togethere here to put
> the best work possible 
> >>>>into the general collection. (smile)
> >>>>
> >>>>E.
> >>>>
> >>>>To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email
> to
> >>>>bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the
> subject line.  To get a list 
> >>>>of available commands, put the word 'help' by
> itself in the subject 
> >>>>line.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> >>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 /
> Virus Database: 
> >>>>269.15.6/1086 - Release Date: 10/22/2007 7:57 PM
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email
> to
> >>>bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the
> subject line.  To get a list 
> >>>of available commands, put the word 'help' by
> itself in the subject line.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>__________ NOD32 2626 (20071030) Information
> __________
> >>>
> >>>This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus
> system.
> >>>http://www.eset.com
> >>>
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email
> to
> >> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the
> subject line.  To get a list 
> >> of available commands, put the word 'help' by
> itself in the subject line.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 /
> Virus Database: 
> >> 269.15.6/1086 - Release Date: 10/22/2007 7:57 PM
> >>
> >>
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email
> to
> > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the
> subject line.  To get a list 
> > of available commands, put the word 'help' by
> itself in the subject line.
> > 
> 
>  To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject
> line.  To get a list of available commands, put the
> word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
 To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: