[bksvol-discuss] Re: Txt romances
- From: "CJ Vining" <vining@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 01:19:28 -0700
I have to agree; I've given up on them, because along with the poor quality
scans, often the category and other fields are left blank, there isn't a
synopsis, and I don't like having to search for *all* of the important
information about a book. It seems like the one submitting it, who presumably
cares about the book should care enough to do that. I wonder why the submitter
doesn't clean up the files before sending them in... and why that person
doesn't wonder why their books are so often rejected.
Joanie, who has a lot of stored up irritation about this
----- Original Message -----
From: Julie Morales
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 9:34 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Txt romances
Hi, Gisela. You're braver than I! *smile* I've taken a few of those Txt
romances and won't touch them again. The last one I took I rejected, and I
think I've rejected every one I've touched, so I won't touch them any more.
*smile* They're rated fair and deserve the rating, if not something even less
than that if there could be such a thing. I don't mind putting some work into
my validations. That's why we're here, but when so much of it is totally
incomprehensible, I can't deal with that. *smile* Take care.
Julie Morales
inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows/MSN Messenger (but not email):
mercy0421@xxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: mercy0421
----- Original Message -----
From: Gisela Vazquez
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 4:20 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: submitting Star Wars novel
no I guess someone els took it. I'll be looking for it. I'm actually trying
to validate those txt romances though i've rejected as many as I've excepted. I
think that makes it two for two.
Other related posts:
