Since Brainard brought up the topic, I thought it might be a good time to ask
for thoughts from other birders. Isn't it about time eBird, Cornell, Arkansas
State Records Committee, the ABA, the AOU now AOS et al etc. admit there was
not really adequate evidence presented on the 21st Century Ivory-billed
Woodpecker reports for any of them to have been accepted? Isn't it about time
for them to move those records into the unaccepted records category?
Frank RenfrowFort Thomas, Kentucky
