Maybe it’s because an old friend has just returned to the early morning sky (M42), but I have to agree with Brian here. Not even the most jaw dropping Hubble photograph of this object has ever come close to what I have experienced spending a few hours with it at the scope. The dusty regions float and almost seem to dance at times between you and the luminous part of the nebula itself. There is a “presence” to it that no image has ever captured. Janis Brian Skiff wrote: > The main problem is being able to record and display the > very large dynamic range present between the nucleus region and > even the main outer coma. Easy for your eye, but not for > paper or screen display without compressing the dynamic range > considerably....and doing that without screwing up the gradients > in the scene. I've seen some over-masked/over-sharpened/over-whatever > images posted in the last two days where simply too much processing > has been applied. Artistically "interesting" but not a faithful > rendering of the event. > > \Brian > -- > See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please > send personal replies to the author, not the list. > > > -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.