> Thanks to everyone who tried! > > I saw the star disappear, but for 2.8 seconds, which is considerably longer > than the 1.9 seconds they said was supposed to be the maximum duration. It > was also 48 seconds earlier than predicted. Tom should have seen it in > Tempe, as the path was NE to SW, and he is roughly SSW of me. So now I am > wondering if I really saw it! Randy, The asteroid is only 15km in diameter, so I can imagine how you could have seen it, but not me. The 2.8 seconds duration is surprising, though! That (and your observing experience) makes me believe that you certainly saw a disappearance. For the record, Jennifer Keller and I observed through our 10-inch scopes, both at about 100x. We are certain we were viewing the correct star, as a nearby clump of 9th magnitude stars in the medium-power field left no doubt. We never planned to time the event, so our WWV substitute was a handsome wall clock that I calibrated to the Weather Channel time. We began continuous viewing at about 10:27, and finished at 10:34, bracketing the predicted time of 10:31. This should be interesting to discuss at tonight's EVAC meeting (in lieu of an actual main speaker). Tom -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.