I'm sending this on behalf of Richard who gets those annoying =20 thingies when he posts... so all de-comments are his and I de-claim any responsibility for them. Except for de-following, as no-one as said it yet... "It's deplane, it's deplane..." I like "Captain Stubing, the passengers are de-enboatened..." Following is Richards post: -----Original Message----- From: Bell Richard, Melbourne Sent: 04- May- 05 11:03 AM To: 'austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: RE: Re: Detrain? Just to add a different slant on things . . . It amuses me that tech writers (language experts of a sort) are often quick to condemn the latest coinage or unusual use of a word (using a verb as a noun etc), when all through history this has been happening and will continue to happen as the language evolves. There is nothing 'wrong' with de-this or de-that: it's just that these are not familiar words. If more people start using them, they will become familiar and you won't notice them anymore. Many of the familiar 'de-' words (and thousands of other coinages) would have sounded odd when first used; now you don't think twice about them. I rather like 'deboat' and 'deplane' - why not? 'Upstanding' has a certain tone that suits ceremonial occasions Of course, as a tech writer I stick to the conventions of the day . . . Language is a series of arbitrary conventions, not a necessary state of affairs like geology. Richard Bell ************************************************** To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field. To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field. To search the austechwriter archives, go to www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter To contact the list administrator, send a message to austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx **************************************************