[AR] Re: some interesting developments
- From: "John Dom" <johndom@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:55:37 +0100
Make that rocket reusable and getting cubesats by the thousands in orbit gets
so cheap everyone will want their very own satellite.
Why create thousands more space shrapnel items. Worse, going to orbit
capability is amateur (or terrorist) ICBM range capability.
Not good.
jd
-----Original Message-----
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Monroe L. King Jr.
Sent: donderdag 31 december 2015 0:10
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: some interesting developments
This is a duh idea started in the 50's with project "Pilot" or "Notsnik"
by Howard Wilcox
It's very obviously the cheapest way to orbit for a small payload.
What's happening now is useful payloads are getting small enough.
Make that rocket reusable and getting cubesats by the thousands in orbit gets
so cheap everyone will want their very own satellite.
Drone aircraft launchers and drone reusable rockets all day long.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [AR] Re: some interesting developments
From: qbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, December 30, 2015 3:33 pm
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm not sure if anyone saw this but I found it while researching the
Northrop TR108 peroxide motor.
What's rather interesting that Ventions, the Company running this for
DARPA and NASA, parallels a lot of what we have been talking here on
Arocket.
http://www.americaspace.com/?p=83211
Robert
Other related posts:
