[AR] Re: practical electric thruster propellant and power?

  • From: Henry Vanderbilt <hvanderbilt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 18:36:21 -0700

On 2/14/2016 6:19 PM, Peter Fairbrother wrote:

On 15/02/16 00:10, David Weinshenker wrote:
On 02/09/2016 02:36 PM, Henry Spencer wrote:
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016, Ed LeBouthillier wrote:
My larger point is that there are other kinds of electrical propulsion
worth considering.

Quite true.  For example, anyone who's thinking electric propulsion but
hasn't looked at electrothermal systems is missing what might easily be
the best answer for near-term missions.

So an eletrothermal thruster is basically a rocket (from the
thermodynamic point of view) - requiring a pressurized chamber
(and hence a high-pressure feed system) and an expansion nozzle?

oh no.

Consider a US navy development railgun as a rocket motor, firing solid
projectiles and using the recoil as thrust.

Perhaps not the best model, as they do use gas pressure at least partly,
so maybe a linear accelerator of some stripe.


Or, incrementally feed a solid rod of propellant into your expansion chamber and electrically zap (to use a highly technical term) one pulse of propulsion at a time off the end. Or, feed solid pellets and zap them. In either case, your feed can be low-pressure. (True of pulsed rockets in general, I suppose.)

Henry


Other related posts: