[argyllcms] Re: issues with undocumented targen options (Re: Scanner profile)
- From: Klaus Karcher <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:59:44 +0100
Graeme Gill wrote:
Klaus Karcher wrote:
I tried to play with the undocumented targen options and found some
oddities in combination with the pre-conditioning profile option "-c" .
Hi Klaus, are you sure that the "-c" option was getting mixed up with
"-A c" ?
Do you have an example ?
When I revert to the original targen.c and just use the patched ofps.c,
I get:
targen -v1 -d 4 -e 1 -A p1.0 -A c0.0 -c test.icc -f 2052 test_
[...]
Degree of adaptation: 0.000
Adaptation weights: Device = 1.000, Perceptual = 0.000, Curvature = 0.000
targen -v1 -d 4 -e 1 -A p1.0 -A c0.0 -f 2052 test_
[...]
Degree of adaptation: 0.000
Adaptation weights: Device = 1.000, Perceptual = 0.000, Curvature = 0.000
... and when I use also the patched targen.c, I get:
targen -v1 -d 4 -e 1 -A p1.0 -A u0.0 -c test.icc -f 2052 epson_
[...]
Degree of adaptation: -1.000
Adaptation weights: Device = 0.000, Perceptual = 1.000, Curvature = 0.000
targen -v1 -d 4 -e 1 -A p1.0 -A u0.0 -f 2052 epson_
[...]
Degree of adaptation: -1.000
Adaptation weights: Device = 0.000, Perceptual = 1.000, Curvature = 0.000
Klaus
Other related posts:
