Gerhard Fuernkranz wrote:
I did some trials (though with a different display). However, there seem to be banding issues. Looks like -qh is a must for this kind of profiles (though -qm gives reasonable results for a CIELAB PCS, using the same .ti3).
Do you think this is the A2B or B2A tables ?
[ A refinement that I haven't got around to adding is to use the
per-channel tables to scale the cLUT grid region to just surround
the gamut of the device in the B2A. ]
cheers,
Graeme Gill.
