[argyllcms] Re: i1pro wrong XYZ values

  • From: Roger <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:32:29 -0500

For sure, it is microWatts. Unfortunately, they use "mW" in their specs but
they really mean "micro". I know. Non standard.

Roger

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-
> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Graeme Gill
> Envoyé : 15 février 2009 20:53
> À : argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Objet : [argyllcms] Re: i1pro wrong XYZ values
> 
> Roger wrote:
> > You don't mean the unit of spectral radiance reported by the
> EyeOnePro in
> > emissive mode, do you? Because I once asked the question to
> GretagMacbeth
> > and I was told microwatts/cm2/nm or mw/cm2/nm. It took a lot of
> > correspondence to get a firm answer to this one.
> 
> Yes, that's the type of thing. The above aren't equivalent though,
> milliwatts
> being 1000 times bigger than microwatts (uW). The closest to
> KW/m^2/nm might be mW/mm^2/nm.
> 
> Graeme Gill.



Other related posts: