Alberto Ferrante wrote:
The problem I am facing is with gamma: dispread -r measures, with the profile obtained by using the command above, a gamma of 2.82 which is pretty high. I have not set any ambient light adjustment, therefore I do not understand why gamma is not 2.2 as it should be. The same command, with the Spyder2, was giving a gamma of approximately 2.2. The ambient light measured by argyll is approximately 14.5, but, as I said, I haven't used this parameter.
Without the readings from the two devices to compare, it's difficult to know why they come up with the different numbers. I'm not sure why you think the display "should be 2.2". The point of calibration and profiling is to not assume anything about the display, but to measure it so that its actual behaviour can be compensated for. <http://www.argyllcms.com/doc/gamma.html> might be of interest too. Graeme Gill.