[argyllcms] Re: V1.1.0 Perseptual rending Qst
- From: "Wallden Magnus" <prn.scr@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:07:31 -0800
Hi !
It might depend on the scanner calibration chart. The best results I got
with
using a scanner as an instrument substitute was to create a custom
scanner
chart using the printer of 400 - 1000 points, measure it with an
instrument,
and then create a cLUT base scanner profile. This would only be of
practical
use of course, if one has access to an instrument to create the scanner
test
chart.
Graeme Gill.
Agree !
My reference is wolf faust IT8, and it seems as the printed black
perhaps is a little more black.
I tried some diffrent scanner profile, and a "-qm -u" (cLUT) seems to
work best.
It is a mail whit some files sent.
//Magnus
.
Other related posts:
