[argyllcms] Re: {Spam?} Re: Number of patches vs. profile quality

  • From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 14:06:18 +1000

Nikolay Pokhilchenko wrote:
It's interesting question. From my experience, there is not enough 1400 patches 
for
profiling "unknown" RGB printer (Canon or Epson with non-original inks). The 
most
problems are in the darks: the printer and paper combination may have an 
unpredictable
behavior (steepness of device response in dark region) and the 1440 patches of 
OFPS is
insufficient. With 1440 patches, darks are not well characterized in 50% of 
cases.
There may be few patches per volume unit of the darks.

Hi Nikolay,
        where in the dark gamut do you think this problem lies ?
Towards neutral, or towards the edge of the gamut ?

Graeme Gill.

Other related posts:

  • » [argyllcms] Re: {Spam?} Re: Number of patches vs. profile quality - Graeme Gill