Ivan Tsyba wrote: > Profile check complete, errors: max. = 54.739534, avg. = 3.634257, RMS = > 7.913384 Something has not lined up properly - there's at least one patch out of place. Using profcheck -v2 will reveal which patches are not correctly read. > Profile check complete, errors: max. = 50.801395, avg. = 2.787503, RMS = > 6.151080 > > After third measuring of this chart using 1.4.0 chartread and colprof I got > completely different results: > > Profile check complete, errors: max. = 3.024343, avg. = 0.892335, RMS = > 1.033585 > > So old 1.4.0 give in my case better results than 1.6.3 > > I do something wrong? I missed something? Something strange is going on. How have you printed the chart ? Note that by default chartread will automatically determine what direction each strip was read. If the chart wasn't arranged to maximise the direction differences, then this may not work reliably and the chartread -B flag should be used and the strips read in the forward direction only. > Here I post all logs and produced files (1.2 Mb): > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28502325/Argyll_logs.zip Notice that it is the D and perhaps R strip that has not been read correctly. Graeme Gill.