On 2 Dec 2007 as I do recall, Frank de Bruijn wrote: > In article <281fe04a4f.ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > Richard Porter <ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > That would be useful, but if I dare mention it there's one other datum > > that would be good to have - the message length. > > OK. I'll put that in as well. > Thanks - that would be handy here to, as it's the usual reason I defer e-mails... I'm just wondering how big the Marking window is likely to get! :-( -- Harriet Bazley == Loyaulte me lie == Strategic withdrawal - running away with dignity!