[antispam-f] Re: Forwarding (again)
- From: Dave Barnett <as10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 08:58:59 GMT
In a recent message Richard Porter <ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On 27 Dec 2006 Harriet Bazley wrote:
>
>> On 27 Dec 2006 as I do recall,
>> Richard Porter wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Anyway, having diverted all the spam detected by AntiSpam but not
>>> marked as spam by PlusNet, I'd like to know if there's a way to mark
>>> messages so that they can be filtered into the Spam folder in MPro.
>>> That way they could be bounced en masse with all the other spam picked
>>> up by SpamStamp.
>>>
>>> I can't see an obvious way of doing this. One possibility could be to
>>> add an X-AntiSpam-Rule header (0 for defaulted messages) so that I can
>>> filter on the rule number being over a certain value.
>
>> How about configuring the X-AntiSpam-Action header to be on, then
>> filtering in Messenger on "X-AntiSpam-Action = 'divert'"?
>
> Thanks. I hadn't spotted that. Of course it still means that I have to
> go through all the diverts and accept them. In that case if a message
> is diverted and then accepted I assume the X-AntiSpam-Action header
> will still say "divert"? What I really need is a method of accepting
> mail and marking it Spam.
>
I use SpamStamp ( http://home.c2i.net/jjvdgeer/riscos/spamstamp.html )
to do that.
--
Dave
Keep GMT all year
Other related posts:
