[amayausers.com] Re: Digitized logo format
- From: webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:22:36 UT
This message was posted by Nevi on AmayaUsers.com. PLEASE DO NOT REPLY VIA
EMAIL. Instead, respond to the thread on the WEBSITE by clicking here:
http://www.amayausers.com/boards/ultimatebb.php?/topic/2/522.html#000004
hi:)
There is a difference in what you see as software native files ,and in what you
see as the output machine files. Machines files have very low level info, so,
eg if save in your main software format, you see everything looks just dandy,
and tweaked etc exactly as you did it onscreen. The differences come in in the
translation to the Machine files eg. cnd. etc..Some find these differences
confusing to work with. EXP files hold information ok, and look nicer. One
reason that many prefer the simple DST files is that they are generally less of
a problem to work with.
People find it irritating,and a bit mind boggling to figure out why their minor
tweaks etc that they perform in native software, doesn't really seem to have
an exact result in the embroidery file. Most perform edits in high zoom factors
and find almost no change in the output files.
In general,melco files can prove to be problematic to edit, to get very
successful machine results , and what you see as the design visibly changing ,
is because of the low level information held by the machine file.
bye
Nevi
www.efectpro.com (http://www.efectpro.com)
www.-cliqq.com (http://www.-cliqq.com)
*180 Free Designs* Have a little fun.
===========================================================
The AmayaUsers Mailing List
Website: http://www.amayausers.com
Discussion Board: http://www.amayausers.com/boards
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.amayausers.com/list
===========================================================
Other related posts:
