Tom sorry been out of town for halloween, I'll upload the config later tonight... 2011/10/30 Tom Giordano <tomgiordano83@xxxxxxxxx> > Sebastian, I'm confident the source I have will work. Its not what ships > on the device, and ZTE should provide that code, but its better than > nothing. Can you grab /proc/config.gz off your device so I can make sure it > compiles before uploading the source. > > Tom. > > > 2011/10/30 Sebastian Robinson <sebastian.robinson@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Yes sorry I meant Ben... >> >> I blame the jet lag :) >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Oct 29, 2011, at 20:13, rjm2k1 <rjm2k1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi seb I think your message was directed at zte. Personally I will be >> sticking with my blade for the next six months or so after which I will see >> what's out there. Unless zte change their attitude it won't be one of >> their devices for me next, its one thing providing little or no support but >> deliberately preventing those who are willing to do it for free and totally >> ignoring licence obligations of software provided to them for free is >> unacceptable in my book. >> maybe the fsf or google will educate them and improve the situation but >> that remains to be seen. At least mainstream manufacturers are now seeing >> the light and opening up their devices. Maybe zte will see the skate flop >> and see the error of their ways. >> Rob >> On 29 Oct 2011 19:58, "Sebastian Robinson" <sebastian.robinson@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> Do you have any update for us? its been a week now... >>> >>> >>> I'm back in the US for Halloween and I've noticed that Boost Mobile are >>> selling a ZTE Warp and AT&T are selling another device called the Avail >>> that is apparently another ZTE device... >>> >>> neither of those two appear on your support site, so that is now at >>> least three devices on sale with out the kernel sources being available... >>> >>> I'm sure your aware that the success of the Blade was helped someway by >>> the open source development community, and I'd hoped that you'd be able to >>> lever that go onto bigger and better things, but at the moment its not >>> panning out that way. If I was confident that the bootloader was >>> functional and there was kernel source for these devices I'd of bought both >>> of these devices but after the issues with the Turies I thought twice.... >>> >>> Sebastian >>> >>> 2011/10/24 <ying.ben@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> i'm here, i'm always here. >>>> >>>> Pls don't worry, and pls don't hurry. >>>> >>>> There are a lot of departments in the big ZTE company, so there are a >>>> lot of walls between the departments. >>>> >>>> So we need some times to handle an issue but we will do it. >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> >>>> Ben | 应贲 *System engineer* >>>> Project Management Dept. IV | ZTE Handset Division >>>> Seat A2016, Room A205, No.889 Bibo Road, Pudong District, Shanghai. >>>> Tel:+86-21-6889-5200 | Mail:ying.ben@xxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> >>>> *kb <krister@xxxxxxxxxxxx>* >>>> 发件人: ztebladeopensource-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> 2011-10-24 03:07 >>>> 请答复 给 >>>> ztebladeopensource@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> 收件人 >>>> ztebladeopensource@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> 抄送 >>>> 主题 >>>> [ztebladeopensource] Re: Turies >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So when HTC, Samsung and SonyEricsson has started to open up their >>>> bootloaders (SonyEricsson and Samsung even gave away free phones to >>>> CyanogenMod developers), ZTE starts to make their platform more closed. >>>> That is a bad move in my opinion. >>>> >>>> Do they not realize that open and customizable phones and tablets is >>>> what people wants and expects now? >>>> >>>> I Sweden users of the ZTE V9/Light even bought me a tablet because they >>>> wanted custom ROMs for it. They suggested it, not me. Now they can all >>>> enjoy a very stable Android 2.3.7 (in the form of CyanogenMod) on their >>>> tablets thanks to the community. We can even do multitouch gestures as >>>> zooming and rotating even though it's a single touch resistive screen. And >>>> all the work the community put into it can be found on github so what we >>>> fix and enhance can be useful for ZTE. >>>> >>>> If this is where ZTE is heading, then my next device will be from a >>>> different manufacturer. >>>> >>>> /kallt_kaffe >>>> >>>> PS. I also would like to know where I can find the kernel source for >>>> the ZTE V9C (Reliance 3G tab). >>>> >>>> Sebastian Robinson skrev 2011-10-23 18:29: >>>> Thats very true, it makes the Turies a bit of a non-starter for us tho, >>>> theres no released exploit for 2.3.5 as of yet, so no way to root it, and >>>> there is no kernel source, or anyway to re-write the boot partition if we >>>> did.. >>>> >>>> lets hope that the fastboot problems are an error and will be fixed >>>> with an update.... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 23 Oct 2011, at 09:18, József Király wrote: >>>> >>>> It might be a modified fastboot, what only accepts uploads via a serial >>>> console - JTAG, by example. It wouldn't be a surprise, as ZTE has been >>>> deliberately trying to disable user-flashing, and removing fastboot is a >>>> bit against the Android principles (to always have a method what can >>>> recover a dead device). While this principle is not official, as I heard, >>>> Google requires it most of the time (to make the work of warranty services >>>> easier, and unified, except Samsung ofc...), and disabling it wasn't the >>>> best step, so locking it down (á lá HTC) might be a better solution. >>>> >>>> 2011/10/23 Tom Giordano <*tomgiordano83@xxxxxxxxx*<tomgiordano83@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> > >>>> Fastboot without USB is a bit pointless, I don't know why they would >>>> both including it in the bootloader, but if you can't see anything in lsusb >>>> it is certainly broken. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 23 October 2011 11:04, Sebastian Robinson <* >>>> sebastian.robinson@xxxxxxxxxx* <sebastian.robinson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> I'll grab a config tomorrow, if I try and build it against the SKATE >>>> kernel source there is seems more than happy until it gets to the board >>>> file, so I cant imagine its going to be too different... >>>> >>>> but then it is the usual story with ZTE now, we could 'fix' it but I'd >>>> rather have the official source from them since its part of the licence >>>> terms.... >>>> >>>> >>>> Im fairly sure that fastboot has no USB, I've not had this problem with >>>> any of the other devices I've tried it with, from my linux box doing an >>>> lsusb just shows no USB devices, I've tried it on a windows PC and OSX just >>>> to be sure. >>>> >>>> I also tried using USBTrace on my windows box and its not seeing any >>>> sort of activity on the USB port when its in fastboot mode, I can get the >>>> thing into FTM and it's connectable via QPST so im fairly sure there is >>>> something up with fastboot mode..... >>>> >>>> unless you have any other ideas I could try >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 23 Oct 2011, at 00:50, Tom Giordano wrote: >>>> >>>> The board files should be fairly easy to add (assuming the 2.6.32 >>>> source is correct). Can you pull a config from your device so I can test it >>>> compiles before I upload source (I can't find a Turies rom). >>>> >>>> USB should work in fastboot, maybe you have a permissions problem (if >>>> using linux run it as root). USB is deliberately disabled in recovery by >>>> ZTE's FTM_MODE config switch. >>>> >>>> On 23 October 2011 04:24, Sebastian Robinson <* >>>> sebastian.robinson@xxxxxxxxxx* <sebastian.robinson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> Hi Guys, >>>> >>>> I'm not sure if anyone is still subscribed here, or if ZTE follow this, >>>> but I just wanted to flag up that the ZTE Turies is now available to buy in >>>> the UK, but there is no sign of the source code on ZTE's support site.... >>>> It comes with a 2.6.35 kernel, so I checked the Skate and Roamer source but >>>> was unable to build a kernel using that since the board files are missing. >>>> >>>> I also noticed that when I reboot the device into recovery or fastboot >>>> mode there is no USB, is this on purpose? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Sebastian >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------- >>>> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is >>>> solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is >>>> confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and >>>> are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others. >>>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended >>>> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. >>>> If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of >>>> the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the >>>> individual sender. >>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system. >>>> >>>> >>> >