I wrote: > Delphi Inspiration wrote: > > Therefore I am not sure if this justifies the amount of work to > > implement and maintain loadable extensions for DISQLite3. All SQLite > > core functions must be wrapped by a "cdecl" to "fastcall" translation > > wrapper. > > > > Is this worth the effort? What do others think? > > In that case it is not worth the effort, I think. If I really want to > create my extension I will use it with the sqlite3.exe binary then. On a second thought: How about ensuring the extension fits to SQLiteSpy by requiring the DLL to have some dummy "disqlite3_init" export function? And/or use a custom "load_di_extension()" SQL wrapper function to load the plugin? I admit it feels "hacky" but that would allow to use SQLiteSpy for ad-hoc debugging of applications compiled with DISQLite3. If extensions can be loaded by SQLiteSpy or not: Thanks for the nice SQLite debugging tool! Tobias _______________________________________________ Delphi Inspiration mailing list yunqa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx //www.freelists.org/list/yunqa