Hi everyone,
April is here and it is an even-number-month which means
#JournalClubOnSession this month. The paper we'll be discussing was
suggested by Sergio Milheiras, it's entitled "Five reasons why the
Science publication “Assessing nature’s contributions to people” (Diaz et
al. 2018) would not have been accepted in Ecosystem Services." by Bratt
(2018) which follows a controversial paper published at the start of the
year. The discussion is still going on, and the topic is relevant for all
of us as young specialists involved in the topic of Ecosystem Services. You
can read more and follow the discussion about this topic here
<http://science.sciencemag.org/content/359/6373/270/tab-e-letters>, there's
still more to say about it.
But first of all, follow this link
<https://doodle.com/poll/sqt7fzr8rgw7gnns> and participate in the poll to
define a day in which we can sit and talk about it via GoogleHangouts.
Also, don't forget to suggest more interesting and recent literature that
we can discuss for next sessions by visiting the "What to read
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RTUCIPLgxTtgoK9_-Ea-eNiiVgOH7sFb53ggEcDcxeI/edit?usp=sharing>"
format.
Go vote! Go read! Go take a stance!
arturo
(on behalf of the JCTeam)
