Re: Sort of a not really a potential bug report. -ish.
- From: Andrew Apted <aapted@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: yadex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:25:56 +1100
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:23:11PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote:
> On 2003-11-19 15:54 +0100, ras2 wrote:
> > If that's the case, might it be possible, and better, to use some symbol
> > on the map to show superimposed objects? Then one would know where they
> > are and could just shuffle linedefs in the usual manner to get at them.
>
> Yes, possibly. But I'm afraid it might be even more CPU
> -intensive than multiple info boxes. At a zeroth approximation,
> the latter is a plain O(n) scan, and the former involves at the
> minimum allocating and sorting (O(n log n)) a table of size n.
> Doesn't seem like a good idea to put that in draw_map().
Would it suffice to do the check in the "check level" function
(possibly have a new menu item "find superimposed objects") ?
Cheers,
--
Andrew Apted <ajapted@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Other related posts:
