[belated reply, apologies] On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:42:07PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote: > If it complains about "é", it's a bit stickier as it would have > to be simulated with overstriking, IIRC. Groff lets you specify > arbitrary unicode characters but it's a Groff extension. Yes it does complain about the acute-accented-e, unfortunately. The groff extension does stop it complaining, but of course that means it isn't pure roff anymore. However in debian that might not be a problem (groff might be essential. The package is priority: optional, but it might be implicitly essential). It would be only a very minor patch for me to maintain - I will dig. > > b) On the man front, there's a deutex.6 in the root of the build > > directory and also in docsrc. Would you like a patch to clarify which > > is 'master'? > > Maybe. I'm not sure what sort of patch you have in mind. Neither am I yet - still trying to unravel how this works. I gather ./deutex.6 is derived from ./docsrc/deutex.6, but isn't re-built on each make clean; make cycle. I see ./unixtmp1/deutex.6 is built from `deutex -man`. I haven't read much further. -- Jon Dowland http://jon.dowland.name/