On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 17:50 +0100, Erik Andersen wrote: > Hi Jean-Paul, Thanks a lot for your offer to participate. > > > > To others, I have received a response from Steve Kill, who likes the > concept. I would appreciate comments from others. I guess that Isode generally, and not just Steve Kille, is interested in this. (Particularly, perhaps, Kurt Zeilenga who is the author of RFC 4512, which defines the LDAP Schema objects). I have a few initial comments: - LDAP attributes have a syntax which is an OID identifying the data type and an optional 'length'. The latter has the somewhat loose semantics of being a minimum upper bound which a server should support, although a server can support longer values. So it is somewhat different from a size constraint on an ASN.1 type. - LDAP matching rules also have an LDAP syntax, but without the length. - LDAP schema objects can have multiple names (e.g. 'cn' and 'commonName'). - LDAP schema object can have a description, which is UTF-8. There are also extensions. best regards David ----- www.x500standard.com: The central source for information on the X.500 Directory Standard.