[x500standard] SV: Re: Operational Binding Management (1)
- From: "Erik Andersen" <era@xxxxxxx>
- To: <x500standard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:47:27 +0100
Hi Burcu,
Nice to hear from you and it is good you are active on the list.
Yes that is true, but as to my understanding, the ASN.1 in Annex B is not
part of the DSP.
Kind regards,
Erik Andersen
Andersen's L-Service
Elsevej 48,
DK-3500 Vaerloese
Denmark
Mobile: +45 2097 1490
e-amail: era@xxxxxxx
Skype: andersen-erik
<http://www.x500.eu/> http://www.x500.eu/
<http://www.x500standard.com/> http://www.x500standard.com/
<http://dk.linkedin.com/in/andersenerik>
http://dk.linkedin.com/in/andersenerik
Fra: x500standard-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:x500standard-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] På vegne af Burcu Ardic
Sendt: 21. november 2011 11:39
Til: x500standard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Emne: [x500standard] Re: Operational Binding Management (1)
Hi Erik,
Actually, DSP -rather than hierarchical operational bindings- has a seperate
bind (specified in X518 clause 11).
Kind regards,
Burcu
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Erik Andersen <era@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Folks,
I am a little confused about some issue.
There is a particular bind for (28.6 of X.501). However, the DISP has also a
bind operation on top of that (7.4.1 of X.525), while hierarchical
operational bindings (clause 24 of X.518) does not have a separate bind. Why
this difference?
Erik Andersen
Andersen's L-Service
Elsevej 48,
DK-3500 Vaerloese
Denmark
Mobile: +45 2097 1490 <tel:%2B45%202097%201490>
e-amail: <http://era@xxxxxxx> era@xxxxxxx
Skype: andersen-erik
http://www.x500.eu/
http://www.x500standard.com/
<http://dk.linkedin.com/in/andersenerik>
http://dk.linkedin.com/in/andersenerik
Other related posts:
