[quickphilosophy] Re: 1.12; 1.13; 1.2 & 1.21

  • From: wittrsl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: quickphilosophy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:45:32 -0000


--- In quickphilosophy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Martin N Brampton <martin.lists@...> 
wrote:
>
> That seems a circular argument - it only works if you assume at the 
> outset that it is true.
> 

Maybe it would be circular if it were an argument, but it isn't an argument at 
all.  It's an explanation.

W



Other related posts: