(no subject)
Received: from [69.147.65.173] by n37.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04
Aug 2010 19:46:26 -0000
Received: from [98.137.34.35] by t15.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04
Aug 2010 19:46:26 -0000
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:46:25 -0000
From: "walto" <walterhorn@xxxxxxxxx>
To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [quickphilosophy] What are objects, and what is the form of an
atomic prop?
Message-ID: <i3cg2h+ak38@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <888683.31211.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 209.6.25.22
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
Sender: notify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Ron. Thanks for your comments--I was getting very lonely.
I'm a bit short of time at present, so will only note now that your remarks=
seem quite un-Griffinian (even if they're not un-Tractarian). How much of=
the Griffin book have you gotten through so far? And, in your opinion, ho=
w did he get so off base with respect to what W had in mind as elementary p=
rops and (atomic) objects?
Walto
==========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
Other related posts:
