--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gordon Swobe <wittrsamr@...> wrote: > > --- On Fri, 3/19/10, jrstern <wittrsamr@...> wrote: > > > Can you show us who ever said syntax *is* either > > constitutive or sufficient for semantics? > > Stuart seems to think it is. So, Searle in 1980 was reacting to Stuart in 2010? Josh ========================================= Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/