[Wittrs] Re: Syntax and Semantics in Mathematics

  • From: "iro3isdx" <xznwrjnk-evca@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:10:20 -0000

--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Joseph Polanik <jPolanik@...> wrote:

> review the material I quoted from the Wikipedia article:

> "According to formalism, the truths expressed in logic and
> mathematics are not about numbers, sets, or triangles or any other
> contensive subject matter ? in fact, they aren't 'about' anything
> at all. They are syntactic forms whose shapes and locations have
> no meaning unless they are given an interpretation (or semantics)."

> in what way does that contradict the claim that syntax is not
> sufficient for semantics?

Let's try paraphasing that.

I am sitting down sucking on a lemon.  I remark that the lemon  is sour.
Joe overhears this, and asks "In what way does that  contradict the
claim that chocolate does not taste good?"

I am at a loss for words.  I am not sure how to respond.  But I do
wonder what Joe has been smoking lately.


Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/

Other related posts: