[Wittrs] Re: Ontologically Basic Ambiguity: Mode of Existence

  • From: Gordon Swobe <gts_2000@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:43:07 -0700 (PDT)

--- On Mon, 3/22/10, SWM <wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> That's because in the Chinese Room our man is ONLY a CPU,

The idea that he exists only as a CPU comes from you, not from Searle. Perhaps 
you should read Searle on his own thought experiment!

http://web.archive.org/web/20071210043312/http://members.aol.com/NeoNoetics/MindsBrainsPrograms.html



-gts


      
==========================================

Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/

Other related posts: