[Wittrs] Re: I Experience in Ordinary Language

  • From: "Cayuse" <z.z7@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 13:25:58 -0000

Joseph Polanik wrote:
what part of this proves that an afterimage is not an experienceable
phenomenon; or, that experienceable phenomena are not different in
kind from measurable phenomena (such as the wavelength of
electromagnetic radiation)?

Phenomena such as an afterimage are parts of the *contents* of experience. Such contents may be categorized as quantifiable and unquantifiable, but "experience", taken to mean the sum total of all of that content, is not a part of that content. The sum total of the parts cannot be a part of itself, but the *idea* of that sum total *is* just such a part.
==========================================

Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/

Other related posts: