[Wittrs] I Experience in Ordinary Language

  • From: Joseph Polanik <jpolanik@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:03:41 -0500

Cayuse wrote:

>Joseph Polanik wrote:

>>you would have to have a very peculiar definition of either
>>'experience' or 'phenomenon' to avoid classifying an afterimage as an
>>experienceable phenomenon.

>Phenomena are parts of the *contents* of experience, and "experience",
>taken to mean the sum total of all of that content, is not a
>phenomenon.

what part of this proves that an afterimage is not an experienceable
phenomenon; or, that experienceable phenomena are not different in kind
from measurable phenomena (such as the wavelength of electromagnetic
radiation)?

Joe


--

Nothing Unreal is Self-Aware

@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
      http://what-am-i.net
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@


==========================================

Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/

Other related posts: