[Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism
- From: "SWM" <SWMirsky@xxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 02:02:34 -0000
--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gordon Swobe <wittrsamr@...> wrote:
> --- On Mon, 3/29/10, SWM <wittrsamr@...> wrote:
>
> > No one denies he succeeds in following his English
> > instructions nor do they have to be in English nor does he
> > have to be following them in English. He could be an Urdu
> > man following Urdu instructions, after all!
>
> You say you have read the target paper but I really wonder about that.
>
> In Searle's actual CRA (the one that you persist in ignoring) the man
> implements TWO programs: one in Chinese in which he follows syntactic rules
> in English and one in English in which he also follows syntactic rules in
> English. He cannot understand the Chinese symbols while operating the Chinese
> program but he does understand the English symbols while operating the
> English program.
>
> In both parts of the experiment he does the same sorts of operations -- what
> you call rote processes -- but he understands the symbols in English.
>
> Your theory does not explain the difference.
>
> -gts
It certainly does. The point is what does understanding consist of? Can it be
accounted for by a description of a system in operation. I am arguing that 1)
it can be so conceived because 2) it can be fully accounted for in this way. --
SWM
=========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
Other related posts:
- » [Wittrs] Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- gabuddabout
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- iro3isdx
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- iro3isdx
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- gabuddabout
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- iro3isdx
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism - SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Gordon Swobe
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- SWM
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- Rajasekhar Goteti
- » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism- gabuddabout