[Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism

  • From: "iro3isdx" <xznwrjnk-evca@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:03:18 -0000

--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gordon Swobe <wittrsamr@...> wrote:

> If the man truly has no bigger role in the experiment than you give
> him credit for; that is, if he plays only the role of a cog in the
> machinery implementing so-called rote processes, then he would fail
> to understand the English version of the stories.

This makes no sense.  I am wondering what it is that you fail  to
understand about human learning.

I watch a science program on TV.  Even though I play no role at  all in
the actions of that TV program, I seem to be able to learn  from it.


Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/

Other related posts: