[Wittrs] Re: Dualism Cooties: Ontologically Basic Ambiguity: Identicality

  • From: "jrstern" <jrstern@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:06:25 -0000

--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Joseph Polanik <jPolanik@...> wrote:
> consequently, there is no basis for claiming that Searle is an
> interactive substance dualist. Searle is only alleging that
> there is one substance or kind of object, physical objects.

He says there are at least two kinds of substance, because computers
are the wrong kind to "cause" consciousness.

Whether that makes him a hyperactive substantive duelist or a fifteenth degree 
mason, I have no idea.


Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/

Other related posts: