[Wittrs] Re: Dualism Cooties: Ontologically Basic Ambiguity

  • From: "iro3isdx" <xznwrjnk-evca@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:02:49 -0000

--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "jrstern" <jrstern@...> wrote:

> I mean, we don't really know what is meant by "baseball", so some
> guys get together and specify it, and then we all play.

Similarly, we should just work on the principles of how to build  an
artificial cognitive system.  All of the talk about physicalism,
reductionism, dualism, etc, is just a distraction.


Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/

Other related posts: