--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "gabuddabout" <wittrsamr@...> wrote: > I would like to know if you can find any misstatements in it, > whether technical or other. I'm not quite sure what you mean by "Functional properties are second-order properties." You also say "Second-order properties don't cause anything." However, I am not sure that properties cause anything, anyway. Does a surface reflect a certain part of light spectrum because of its property of blueness, or does it have a property of being blue because it reflects a certain part of the light spectrum? Does an object resist acceleration because it has mass, or does it have mass because it resists acceleration? I guess we tend to use the term "property" a bit too broadly and indiscriminately. I'll question your statement "Some claim that computers may cause consciousness in virtue of running programs (strong AI)." As stated, I don't think that's quite correct. Rather, I would put it as "Some claim that computers might be conscious by virtue of running the 'right' program," where what it takes for a program to be 'right' is not known at this time. Note that my comment is only about what others claim, and not anything I am committed to myself. Regards, Neil ========================================= Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/