[Wittrs] Re: Dancing Dualisms: Searlean Moves and Cartesian Moves--P's @ K's

  • From: "gabuddabout" <gabuddabout@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:03:45 -0000

We may both agree that nothing will settle the issue if it is thought that 
induction won't settle it by definition.  But maybe it isn't incoherent that 
one can learn more about the NCCs anyway?

Anyway, why doesn't my post (to which you just replied) appear below where it 
should?

You were right to say, btw, that I couldn't turn the tables (wouldn't want to 
actually) on someone who was no computationalist.


Cheers,
Budd


=========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/

Other related posts: