Hi Han. Good to hear from you, as always. I'm not sure what you mean by "making the rules as we go up." My book applies a wide array of Wittgenstein's ideas to the question of what a constitution means. I rely upon his views on language meaning, artisan judgments ("aesthetics"), aspect seeing, imponderable evidence, private language and assertability conditions (grammar). I don't think I have one of the so called "rule following passages" of Philosophical Investigations cited, but I could be wrong about that. I do, however, have what I have always considered to be a very important chapter in the book -- Chapter 2 -- on how to follow a flexible rule. Based on the private feedback I've received on the book, however, people are not high on that chapter. I really like it because I think it clarifies the way both Dworkin and political scientists think about how this kind of statement can be "followed:" No State Shall Deny Equal Protection to its citizens. Anyway, always glad to see that you'd find anything I write to be even close to interesting, even as a topic. Regards and thanks. Dr. Sean Wilson, Esq. Assistant Professor Wright State University Personal Website: http://seanwilson.org My New Book: http://flexibleconstitution.squarespace.com/ _______________________________________________ Wittrs mailing list Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://undergroundwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/wittrs_undergroundwiki.org