... found an interesting article on a subject Glen and I were discussing, by Trevor Pateman. I think, though, the term "Wittgensteinian" ought to be limited even further to "this particular brand of it." Because I don't think Kripke's version of Wittgenstein is anything "real" (I believe he admitted that, didn't he?). My point is that I do not take the version of "Kripke, Baker & Hacker, Esa Itkonen and others" to be true to Wittgenstein, as I am glad others also argue. So I would call them something like "reification-branch Wittgensteinians" and believe they have misunderstood certain tutelage. http://www.selectedworks.co.uk/wittgensteinianschomskyans.html Regards and thanks Dr. Sean Wilson, Esq. Assistant Professor Wright State University Redesigned Website: http://seanwilson.org SSRN papers: http://ssrn.com/author=596860 Twitter: http://twitter.com/seanwilsonorg Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/seanwilsonorg New Discussion Group: http://seanwilson.org/wittgenstein.discussion.html WEB VIEW: http://tinyurl.com/ku7ga4 TODAY: http://alturl.com/whcf 3 DAYS: http://alturl.com/d9vz 1 WEEK: http://alturl.com/yeza GOOGLE: http://groups.google.com/group/Wittrs YAHOO: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/ FREELIST: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/09-2009