On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:13 PM, jrstern <jrstern@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "iro3isdx" <xznwrjnk-evca@...> wrote: >> >> > If LW tells us rule explanations are insufficient for how >> > Johnny extends the sequence 2,4,6 ..., just why would it >> > be any better for a machine? > ... >> It is my impression that Wittgenstein was mainly concerned with >> the question if discerning what is the rule, or what "following >> the rule" amounts to. That is generally a problem with rule >> following in language, in sports such as football or baseball, >> and generally in every day activities that we consider to be rule >> following. > > So, LW goes through a lot, to teach us how to see, and not to assume, > yada yada. Here's the thing. What if you *do* follow a rule, that > everyone can see, then what? > > Josh > Then lots of things. Mostly they ignore ya cuz deviations from rules are the exception sorta by definition. It's the rule breakers that make history to some extent. Maybe Skinnerites shoulda marketed themselves as misbehaviorists instead? When worlds collide (cultures clash), the rules themselves get bent, at which point the normal people start to seem more out of control, or call it dancing to a new beat or whatever boom boom pow. Kirby Group Home Page: http://seanwilson.org/wittgenstein.discussion.html Group Discussion Board: http://seanwilson.org/forum/ Google Archive: http://groups.google.com/group/Wittrs FreeList Archive: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs FreeList for September: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/09-2009 FreeList for August: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/08-2009 Group Creator's Page: http://seanwilson.org/ Today's Messages: http://alturl.com/whcf Messages From Last 3 Days: http://alturl.com/d9vz This Week's Messages: http://alturl.com/yeza Yahoo Archive: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/