--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "iro3isdx" <xznwrjnk-evca@...> wrote: > > > If LW tells us rule explanations are insufficient for how > > Johnny extends the sequence 2,4,6 ..., just why would it > > be any better for a machine? ... > It is my impression that Wittgenstein was mainly concerned with > the question if discerning what is the rule, or what "following > the rule" amounts to. That is generally a problem with rule > following in language, in sports such as football or baseball, > and generally in every day activities that we consider to be rule > following. So, LW goes through a lot, to teach us how to see, and not to assume, yada yada. Here's the thing. What if you *do* follow a rule, that everyone can see, then what? Josh Group Home Page: http://seanwilson.org/wittgenstein.discussion.html Group Discussion Board: http://seanwilson.org/forum/ Google Archive: http://groups.google.com/group/Wittrs FreeList Archive: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs FreeList for September: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/09-2009 FreeList for August: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/08-2009 Group Creator's Page: http://seanwilson.org/ Today's Messages: http://alturl.com/whcf Messages From Last 3 Days: http://alturl.com/d9vz This Week's Messages: http://alturl.com/yeza Yahoo Archive: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/