[Wittrs] Re: Following a Rule

  • From: "iro3isdx" <xznwrjnk-evca@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:48:01 -0000

--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "jrstern" <jrstern@...> wrote:


> Let's start with something where you feel happy stipulating
> to the fact that it is a computer.

You seem to have missed the point I was trying to make, though  my post
seems to have stirred up discussion.


> Can a computer have original intentionality, without computing?

Our current computers cannot have original intentionality with or
without computing.  And if we found a way of designing one that did
have original intentionality, then we would probably find that it  was
not nearly as useful for us as our current computers.

Regards,
Neil


WEB VIEW: http://tinyurl.com/ku7ga4
TODAY: http://alturl.com/whcf
3 DAYS: http://alturl.com/d9vz
1 WEEK: http://alturl.com/yeza
GOOGLE: http://groups.google.com/group/Wittrs
YAHOO: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/
FREELIST: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/09-2009

Other related posts: